Loscalzo Yura, Giannini Marco
Department of Health Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Work. 2019;62(3):383-392. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192875.
In literature, there are many instruments for evaluating workaholism; however, they do not have convergent validity, because of the lack of a shared definition of workaholism.
We propose a new instrument for evaluating workaholism and work engagement, namely the Work-related Inventory (WI-10), which is based on Loscalzo and Giannini's (2017) comprehensive definition of workaholism.
We developed a pool of 36 items, covering: 1) addiction symptoms; 2) obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and 3) work engagement. Then, we conducted Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor analyses on a sample of 503 Italian workers (165 males, 337 females, one missing; Mean age = 38.26±10.84) aiming to reduce the number of items.
The results showed a 10-items (2 filler) and 2-factor solution: 1) Workaholism and 2) Work Engagement; moreover, the WI-10 has good internal reliability, convergent and divergent validity.
We found good psychometric properties for the WI-10. We also proposed the cut-off scores for the screening of the four kinds of workers proposed by Loscalzo and Giannini (2017): disengaged workaholics, engaged workaholics, engaged workers, and detached workers. The WI-10 will be useful for both research and preventive and clinical purposes.
在文献中,有许多用于评估工作狂的工具;然而,由于缺乏对工作狂的共同定义,它们没有收敛效度。
我们提出一种用于评估工作狂和工作投入的新工具,即工作相关量表(WI - 10),它基于洛斯科佐和詹尼尼(2017年)对工作狂的全面定义。
我们编制了一组36个项目,涵盖:1)成瘾症状;2)强迫症状,以及3)工作投入。然后,我们对503名意大利工人(165名男性,337名女性,1名缺失;平均年龄 = 38.26±10.84)的样本进行了探索性和验证性因素分析,旨在减少项目数量。
结果显示为一个包含10个项目(2个填充项)和2个因素的解决方案:1)工作狂和2)工作投入;此外,WI - 10具有良好的内部信度、收敛效度和区分效度。
我们发现WI - 10具有良好的心理测量学特性。我们还提出了洛斯科佐和詹尼尼(2017年)提出的四类工人筛查的临界分数:疏离型工作狂、投入型工作狂、投入型员工和超脱型员工。WI - 10将对研究以及预防和临床目的都有用。