Gonçalves Leandro, Meneses Jéssica, Sil Simão, Silva Tatiana, Moreira António C
DEGEIT-Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
INESCTEC-Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Campus da Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;13(7):529. doi: 10.3390/bs13070529.
Although extensively used in the academic literature, workaholism as a concept has been explained in different ways, which has influenced the development and use of some measurement tools. As such, this article aims to address the subject through a systematic study review focusing on articles where the main objective was to develop, adapt, or analyze the psychometric properties of a workaholism scale. The main purpose is to describe the state of the art concerning workaholism measurement tools, highlighting trends and research perspectives for further research. In essence, this study may serve as a summary and starting point for scholars interested in measuring workaholism. It was observed that the discrepancy concerning the definition of workaholism has resulted in scales that attempt to evaluate diverging conceptualizations. Moreover, each scale has been readapted when tested in different countries. For further investigations, it is important to converge the concept of workaholism and validate the scales across differing contexts, regarding the industry, culture, and country of the sample.
尽管工作狂这一概念在学术文献中被广泛使用,但对其的解释却各不相同,这影响了一些测量工具的开发和使用。因此,本文旨在通过系统的文献综述来探讨这一主题,重点关注主要目的是开发、改编或分析工作狂量表心理测量特性的文章。主要目的是描述工作狂测量工具的现状,突出进一步研究的趋势和研究视角。本质上,本研究可为有兴趣测量工作狂的学者提供一个总结和起点。研究发现,工作狂定义上的差异导致了试图评估不同概念化的量表。此外,每个量表在不同国家进行测试时都进行了重新改编。对于进一步的研究来说,在样本的行业、文化和国家等不同背景下,统一工作狂的概念并验证量表是很重要的。