Edinburgh Napier University, School of Health & Social Care,Edinburgh,UK.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Stanford University,California,USA.
Psychol Med. 2019 Aug;49(11):1761-1775. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000436. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
BACKGROUND: The 11th revision to the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) identified complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) as a new condition. There is a pressing need to identify effective CPTSD interventions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), where participants were likely to have clinically significant baseline levels of one or more CPTSD symptom clusters (affect dysregulation, negative self-concept and/or disturbed relationships). We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and PILOTS databases (January 2018), and examined study and outcome quality. RESULTS: Fifty-one RCTs met inclusion criteria. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure alone (EA) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) were superior to usual care for PTSD symptoms, with effects ranging from g = -0.90 (CBT; k = 27, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.68; moderate quality) to g = -1.26 (EMDR; k = 4, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.51; low quality). CBT and EA each had moderate-large or large effects on negative self-concept, but only one trial of EMDR provided useable data. CBT, EA and EMDR each had moderate or moderate-large effects on disturbed relationships. Few RCTs reported affect dysregulation data. The benefits of all interventions were smaller when compared with non-specific interventions (e.g. befriending). Multivariate meta-regression suggested childhood-onset trauma was associated with a poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The development of effective interventions for CPTSD can build upon the success of PTSD interventions. Further research should assess the benefits of flexibility in intervention selection, sequencing and delivery, based on clinical need and patient preferences.
背景:世界卫生组织第 11 次修订的《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)将复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)确定为一种新的疾病。目前迫切需要确定有效的 CPTSD 干预措施。
方法:我们对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的心理干预随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,其中参与者很可能在基线时就存在一个或多个 CPTSD 症状群(情绪失调、消极自我概念和/或人际关系紊乱),且具有临床显著意义。我们检索了 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 PILOTS 数据库(2018 年 1 月),并检查了研究和结果的质量。
结果:51 项 RCT 符合纳入标准。认知行为疗法(CBT)、单纯暴露疗法(EA)和眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)在 PTSD 症状方面优于常规护理,其效果范围从 g = -0.90(CBT;k = 27,95%CI -1.11 至 -0.68;中等质量)到 g = -1.26(EMDR;k = 4,95%CI -2.01 至 -0.51;低质量)。CBT 和 EA 对消极自我概念均有较大或中等偏大量的影响,但只有一项 EMDR 试验提供了可用数据。CBT、EA 和 EMDR 对人际关系紊乱均有中等或中等偏大量的影响。很少有 RCT 报告了情绪失调数据。与非特异性干预(如交友)相比,所有干预措施的益处都较小。多变量荟萃回归表明,儿童期创伤与较差的结局相关。
结论:CPTSD 有效干预措施的开发可以建立在 PTSD 干预措施成功的基础上。进一步的研究应该根据临床需求和患者偏好,评估干预选择、顺序和交付的灵活性的益处。
Evid Based Child Health. 2013-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007-7-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025-12
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2025-7-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-5-6
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2025-4-16