Suppr超能文献

比较单次创伤后儿童创伤后应激障碍的眼球运动脱敏再处理疗法、认知行为写作疗法和等待名单:一项多中心随机临床试验。

Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, cognitive behavioral writing therapy, and wait-list in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder following single-incident trauma: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

MHO Rivierduinen, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Research Group Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;58(11):1219-1228. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12768. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines for childhood posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recommend trauma-focused psychotherapies, mainly cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is a brief trauma-focused, evidence-based treatment for PTSD in adults, but with few well-designed trials involving children and adolescents.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind, randomized trial with three arms (n = 103): EMDR (n = 43), Cognitive Behavior Writing Therapy (CBWT; n = 42), and wait-list (WL; n = 18). WL participants were randomly reallocated to CBWT or EMDR after 6 weeks; follow-ups were conducted at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. Participants were treatment-seeking youth (aged 8-18 years) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD (or subthreshold PTSD) tied to a single trauma, who received up to six sessions of EMDR or CBWT lasting maximally 45 min each.

RESULTS

Both treatments were well-tolerated and relative to WL yielded large, intent-to-treat effect sizes for the primary outcomes at posttreatment: PTSD symptoms (EMDR: d = 1.27; CBWT: d = 1.24). At posttreatment 92.5% of EMDR, and 90.2% of CBWT no longer met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. All gains were maintained at follow-up. Compared to WL, small to large (range d = 0.39-1.03) intent-to-treat effect sizes were obtained at posttreatment for negative trauma-related appraisals, anxiety, depression, and behavior problems with these gains being maintained at follow-up. Gains were attained with significantly less therapist contact time for EMDR than CBWT (mean = 4.1 sessions/140 min vs. 5.4 sessions/227 min).

CONCLUSIONS

EMDR and CBWT are brief, trauma-focused treatments that yielded equally large remission rates for PTSD and reductions in the severity of PTSD and comorbid difficulties in children and adolescents seeking treatment for PTSD tied to a single event. Further trials of both treatments with PTSD tied to multiple traumas are warranted.

摘要

背景

儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的实践指南建议采用以创伤为中心的心理疗法,主要是认知行为疗法(CBT)。眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)疗法是一种针对成人 PTSD 的简短的以创伤为中心的循证治疗方法,但涉及儿童和青少年的精心设计的试验很少。

方法

我们进行了一项单盲、随机试验,分为三组(n=103):EMDR(n=43)、认知行为写作治疗(CBWT;n=42)和等待名单(WL;n=18)。WL 参与者在 6 周后随机重新分配到 CBWT 或 EMDR;在治疗后 3 个月和 12 个月进行随访。参与者为寻求治疗的青少年(8-18 岁),符合 DSM-IV PTSD 诊断(或阈下 PTSD),与单一创伤有关,接受最多 6 次 EMDR 或 CBWT,每次持续最多 45 分钟。

结果

两种治疗方法均耐受良好,与 WL 相比,主要结局在治疗后均产生了较大的意向治疗效应大小:创伤后应激障碍症状(EMDR:d=1.27;CBWT:d=1.24)。在治疗后,92.5%的 EMDR 和 90.2%的 CBWT 不再符合 PTSD 的诊断标准。所有的改善在随访中都得到了维持。与 WL 相比,在治疗后获得了较小到较大的(范围 d=0.39-1.03)意向治疗效应大小,对于负面的与创伤相关的评估、焦虑、抑郁和行为问题,这些改善在随访中得到了维持。与 CBWT 相比,EMDR 获得了明显较少的治疗师接触时间(平均=4.1 次/140 分钟与 5.4 次/227 分钟)。

结论

EMDR 和 CBWT 是简短的以创伤为中心的治疗方法,对于单一事件相关 PTSD 的缓解率和 PTSD 严重程度以及共病困难的严重程度均有同样大的降低。需要进一步对与多种创伤相关的 PTSD 进行这两种治疗方法的试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验