Brown Charlie
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2019 Jan 1;12(3):198-210.
Within the business continuity industry, the debate regarding the business impact analysis (BIA) shows no sign of being resolved. Fervent discussions online, at conferences and in businesses around the world continue to promote or dispute its value. This paper does not pretend to resolve that debate but offers a compelling alternative to achieve the outcomes entrusted to the BIA and overcome the challenges in obtaining them. Business disruptions, both from natural occurrences and manmade, are occurring more frequently at the same time as business continues to get more complex. To exacerbate the issue, business continuity practitioners are increasingly expected to do more, and often with fewer resources and in condensed timeframes. The SIPOC tool from Lean and Six Sigma, which considers suppliers, inputs, process, outputs and customers, gives business continuity practitioners a practical alternative. By using the experiences, expertise and tools of other professions in a transdisciplinary approach, it is possible to accomplish the continuity imperatives of the business while adding value to the organisation when resources available to the practitioner are constantly being compressed.
在业务连续性行业中,关于业务影响分析(BIA)的争论毫无解决的迹象。在网上、会议上以及世界各地的企业中,热烈的讨论仍在继续,各方对其价值褒贬不一。本文无意解决这一争论,而是提供了一个极具说服力的替代方案,以实现赋予业务影响分析的目标,并克服在实现这些目标过程中所面临的挑战。无论是自然事件还是人为造成的业务中断,都在日益频繁地发生,与此同时,业务也变得越来越复杂。更糟糕的是,业务连续性从业者常常被期望在资源更少、时间更紧迫的情况下完成更多工作。精益和六西格玛中的SIPOC工具,该工具考虑了供应商、输入、流程、输出和客户,为业务连续性从业者提供了一个切实可行的选择。通过跨学科的方法运用其他专业的经验、专业知识和工具,在从业者可用资源不断压缩的情况下,既能够完成企业的连续性要求,又能为组织增加价值。