Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jul;257:112153. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
Research linking health and social capital is often cited in relation to global public health policies and programmes that mobilise local community participation in health promotion in marginalised settings. A long-standing criticism of this body of analysis and action is its inadequate attention to the power inequalities that drive poor health, often linked to macro-social forces beyond the reach of local community activism. Supplementing social capital research with attention to more ambitious and wide-ranging forms of health activism tackles this criticism. It puts the reproduction and transformation of health-relevant power inequalities at the heart of social capital research and community mobilisation strategies. We use the South African Treatment Action Campaign as a prototype for expanding understandings of social capital for health promotion. Existing social capital work currently focuses on facilitating community mobilisation to create co-operative bonding and bridging social capital (networks of solidarity within and between marginalised communities respectively), as well as linking social capital (networks uniting marginalised communities and more powerful champions). We call for an expanded focus that takes account of how these co-operative networks may serve as springboards for community involvement in adversarial social movements. In such cases, these networks of solidarity serve as launch pads for various forms of demand and protest where the marginalised and their allies confront power-holders in conflictual struggles over health-relevant social resources. We illustrate this expanded framework with two examples of collective action for mental health: the Movement for Global Mental Health and the UK Mental Health User and Survivor Movement. Both seek to use bonding, bridging and linking networks as the basis for movements to pressurise power-holders to increase access to appropriate psychiatric services, adequate welfare support and social respect and recognition for people living with mental distress.
将健康与社会资本联系起来的研究经常被引用到与全球公共卫生政策和方案中,这些政策和方案动员当地社区参与边缘化环境中的健康促进。对这一分析和行动主体的长期批评是,它对造成健康状况不佳的权力不平等关注不足,而这些不平等往往与地方社区行动主义无法企及的宏观社会力量有关。通过关注更具野心和更广泛的健康行动形式来补充社会资本研究,可以解决这一批评。它将与健康相关的权力不平等的再生产和转变置于社会资本研究和社区动员战略的核心。我们使用南非治疗行动运动(Treatment Action Campaign)作为原型,来扩展对促进健康的社会资本的理解。现有的社会资本工作目前侧重于促进社区动员,以创造合作型黏合和桥接社会资本(分别是边缘化社区内部和之间的团结网络),以及联系社会资本(将边缘化社区与更强大的拥护者联系起来的网络)。我们呼吁扩大重点,以考虑这些合作网络如何成为社区参与对抗性社会运动的跳板。在这种情况下,这些团结网络作为各种形式的需求和抗议的跳板,边缘化群体及其盟友在与健康相关的社会资源的冲突性斗争中与权力持有者对抗。我们用两个心理健康集体行动的例子来说明这个扩展框架:全球精神卫生运动(Movement for Global Mental Health)和英国精神健康使用者和幸存者运动(UK Mental Health User and Survivor Movement)。这两个运动都试图利用黏合、桥接和联系网络作为基础,向权力持有者施压,以增加获得适当精神卫生服务、充分福利支持以及社会对精神困扰人群的尊重和认可的机会。