The law tries to decide whether whooping cough vaccine causes brain damage: Professor Gordon Stewart gives evidence.
出版信息
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 May 10;292(6530):1264-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6530.1264.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The law tries to decide whether whooping cough vaccine causes brain damage: Professor Gordon Stewart gives evidence.法律试图判定百日咳疫苗是否会导致脑损伤：戈登·斯图尔特教授提供证据。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 May 10;292(6530):1264-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6530.1264.
2
The law tries to decide whether whooping cough vaccine causes brain damage: Professor Gordon Stewart gives evidence.法律试图判定百日咳疫苗是否会导致脑损伤：戈登·斯图尔特教授提供证据。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jul 19;293(6540):203-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6540.203-a.
3
Pertussis vaccine litigation in three countries.
Law Med Health Care. 1990 Spring-Summer;18(1-2):59-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb01132.x.
4
Judge "not satisfied" that whooping cough vaccine causes permanent brain damage.法官判定百日咳疫苗不会导致永久性脑损伤。 （注：原英文表述易引起误解，根据正常逻辑理解应是这个意思，不然语义矛盾，按照中文习惯进行了调整性翻译）
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Apr 23;296(6630):1189-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6630.1189.
5
Lessons from the pertussis vaccine court trial.百日咳疫苗法庭审判的教训。
Lancet. 1990 Feb 17;335(8686):397-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90220-y.
6
Court award for pertussis vaccine damage.针对百日咳疫苗损害的法庭裁决。
Lancet. 1993 May 22;341(8856):1338-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90837-7.
7
Pertussis vaccine: court finds no justification for association with permanent brain damage.百日咳疫苗：法院认定其与永久性脑损伤之间不存在关联依据。
Lancet. 1988 Apr 9;1(8589):837. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91706-0.
8
By the London Post. The care of children--pertussis vaccination--dr. David Owen, Foreign Secretary.伦敦邮报报道。儿童护理——百日咳疫苗接种——外交大臣大卫·欧文博士。
N Engl J Med. 1977 Apr 28;296(17):984-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197704282961708.
9
The whooping-cough immunisation controversy.百日咳免疫接种争议。
Arch Dis Child. 1981 Aug;56(8):577-80. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.8.577.
10
Whooping cough vaccination.百日咳疫苗接种
Br Med J. 1977 Feb 26;1(6060):573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6060.573-b.
Zotero 插件