Mayo Marlyn J, Pockros Paul J, Jones David, Bowlus Christopher L, Levy Cynthia, Patanwala Imran, Bacon Bruce, Luketic Velimir, Vuppalanchi Raj, Medendorp Sharon, Dorenbaum Alejandro, Kennedy Ciara, Novak Patricia, Gu Joan, Apostol George, Hirschfield Gideon M
Digestive and Liver Diseases University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX.
Scripps Clinic and Scripps Translational Science Institute La Jolla CA.
Hepatol Commun. 2019 Feb 1;3(3):365-381. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1305. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is typically associated with elevated serum bile acid levels and pruritus, but pruritus is often refractory to treatment with existing therapies. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of maralixibat, a selective, ileal, apical, sodium-dependent, bile acid transporter inhibitor, in adults with PBC and pruritus. Adults with PBC and pruritus who had received ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for ≥6 months or were intolerant to UDCA were randomized 2:1 to maralixibat (10 or 20 mg/day) or placebo for 13 weeks in combination with UDCA (when tolerated). The primary outcome was change in Adult Itch Reported Outcome (ItchRO™) average weekly sum score (0, no itching; 70, maximum itching) from baseline to week 13/early termination (ET). The study enrolled 66 patients (maralixibat [both doses combined], n = 42; placebo, n = 24). Mean ItchRO™ weekly sum scores decreased from baseline to week 13/ET with maralixibat (-26.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -31.8, -21.2) and placebo (-23.4; 95% CI, -30.3, -16.4). The difference between groups was not significant (= 0.48). In the maralixibat and placebo groups, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 97.6% and 70.8% of patients, respectively. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported AEs (maralixibat, 78.6%; placebo, 50.0%). Reductions in pruritus did not differ significantly between maralixibat and placebo. However, a large placebo effect may have confounded assessment of pruritus. Lessons learned from this rigorously designed and executed trial are indispensable for understanding how to approach trials assessing pruritus as the primary endpoint and the therapeutic window of bile acid uptake inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in PBC.
原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)通常与血清胆汁酸水平升高和瘙痒有关,但现有治疗方法往往难以缓解瘙痒症状。这项2期研究评估了maralixibat(一种选择性、回肠、顶端、钠依赖性胆汁酸转运抑制剂)在患有PBC和瘙痒的成人中的疗效和安全性。接受熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)治疗≥6个月或对UDCA不耐受的患有PBC和瘙痒的成人,按2:1随机分组,接受maralixibat(10或20mg/天)或安慰剂治疗13周,并联合使用UDCA(若耐受)。主要结局是成人瘙痒报告结局(ItchRO™)从基线到第13周/提前终止(ET)的平均每周总分变化(0分表示无瘙痒;70分表示最严重瘙痒)。该研究纳入了66例患者(maralixibat[两种剂量合并],n = 42;安慰剂,n = 24)。使用maralixibat时,从基线到第13周/ET,ItchRO™每周总分平均降低(-26.5;95%置信区间[CI],-31.8,-21.2),使用安慰剂时降低(-23.4;95%CI,-30.3,-16.4)。两组之间的差异不显著(P = 0.48)。在maralixibat组和安慰剂组中,分别有97.6%和70.8%的患者报告了不良事件(AE)。胃肠道疾病是报告最频繁的AE(maralixibat组为78.6%;安慰剂组为50.0%)。maralixibat组和安慰剂组在瘙痒减轻方面无显著差异。然而,较大的安慰剂效应可能混淆了对瘙痒的评估。从这项设计严谨、执行良好的试验中吸取的经验教训,对于理解如何开展以瘙痒为主要终点的试验以及将胆汁酸摄取抑制的治疗窗口作为PBC治疗策略而言不可或缺。