Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Sep 1;45(5):493-504. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3808. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate effects of a multicomponent program promoting physical activity on sedentary behavior, physical activity, and body measures, when relocating from cell offices to either a flex or cell office. Methods The Active Office Design (AOD) study is a longitudinal non-randomized controlled study performed in a municipality in northern Sweden. A subsample of 86 participants were randomly recruited from the AOD study to objectively measure sedentary behavior and physical activity, using ActivPAL and ActiGraph, before and after relocation to the two different office types. The multicomponent program promoting physical activity was performed in both offices. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results Eighteen months after relocation, the total number of steps per work day increased by 21% in the flex office and 3% in the cell office group, compared to baseline. Moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during work hours increased by 42% in the flex office group and 19% in the cell office group. No changes were seen regarding sitting time at work. Small additive effects for walking and MVPA were seen for both groups during non-work time. Weight increased in the flex office group. Conclusions This long-term study shows that a multicomponent workplace intervention can lead to increased walking time, steps, and MVPA in a flex compared to a cell office. Small additive increases of physical activity were seen during non-work time in both groups. More long-term controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.
目的 本研究旨在探讨促进身体活动的多组分方案对从细胞办公室搬迁到灵活或细胞办公室后久坐行为、身体活动和身体测量的影响。
方法 积极办公设计(AOD)研究是在瑞典北部一个市进行的一项纵向非随机对照研究。从 AOD 研究中随机招募了 86 名参与者作为子样本,使用 ActivPAL 和 ActiGraph 在搬迁到两种不同办公室类型之前和之后客观测量久坐行为和身体活动。在两个办公室都实施了促进身体活动的多组分方案。使用线性混合模型分析数据。
结果 搬迁后 18 个月,与基线相比,灵活办公室的工作日总步数增加了 21%,细胞办公室增加了 3%。灵活办公室组工作时间内的中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)增加了 42%,细胞办公室组增加了 19%。工作时的久坐时间没有变化。非工作时间,两组的步行和 MVPA 均有小的附加效应。灵活办公室组的体重增加。
结论 这项长期研究表明,与细胞办公室相比,多组分工作场所干预措施可导致灵活办公室的步行时间、步数和 MVPA 增加。两组在非工作时间均观察到身体活动的小的附加增加。需要更多的长期对照研究来证实这些结果。