Tindall B J
Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Inhoffenstraße 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019 Aug;69(8):2602-2605. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003338. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
The term effective publication and the adjectival form effectively published occur at numerous points in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. As defined in Rule 25a the term refers to a form of publication rather than to names or descriptions. Although names are also defined as being effectively published, which is also defined as a status under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, such names are not automatically validly published and only validly published names can have a status under the Code. If one clearly separates the act of publication of scientific works from other elements of the Code then it is possible to clarify the workings of the Code whereby only names included in scientific works that are published in accordance with Rule 25a may have a status under the Code once they are validly published. Similarly names would then be validly published or not validly published, with the latter, irrespective of where they are found, having no status under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
“有效发表”一词以及形容词形式“有效发表的”在《国际原核生物命名法规》中多处出现。如第25a条所定义,该术语指的是一种发表形式,而非名称或描述。尽管名称也被定义为有效发表,这在《国际原核生物命名法规》中也被定义为一种状态,但此类名称并非自动有效发表,只有有效发表的名称才能在该法规下具有某种状态。如果将科学著作的发表行为与法规的其他要素明确区分开来,那么就有可能阐明法规的运作方式,即只有按照第25a条发表的科学著作中所包含的名称,一旦有效发表,才可能在该法规下具有某种状态。同样,名称将被视为有效发表或无效发表,后者无论出现在何处,在《国际原核生物命名法规》下都不具有任何状态。