Davenport Andrew, Guirguis Ayman, Almond Michael, Day Clara, Chilcot Joseph, Wellsted David, Farrington Ken
UCL Department of Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, UK.
Hemodial Int. 2019 Jul;23(3):288-296. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12743. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Conventional haemodialysis (HD) involves treatment times of around 4 hours thrice weekly, taking no account of residual kidney function (RKF). In incremental HD the frequency and duration of dialysis sessions are individualized according to RKF. There are no studies comparing these approaches. We utilized data from a recent multicenter study to compare patient characteristics and outcomes between a center practicing incremental HD and others using a conventional approach.
Seven hundred and nine patients attending for routine outpatient HD in five UK centers were studied. One center practiced incremental dialysis (n = 254) and four conventional HD (n = 455). Data collected included demographics, comorbidity, dialysis parameters, routine biochemistry and hematology, recovery time postdialysis, and Beck Depression Inventory-II score (BDI-II). Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months.
Pre- and postdialysis BP, serum calcium and phosphate were higher in the incremental center, whilst sessional Kt/Vurea was lower (all P < 0.001), as was the proportion of patients with a mean postdialysis BP <100 mmHg (P = 0.011). Patients recovered from their HD session more quickly in the incremental center, with significantly more patients reporting recovery within 1 and 4 hours Short-term survival was significantly better in the incremental center both unadjusted and adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, dialysis vintage, anuria, history of cancer, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, serum albumin, BDI-II score, and sessional Kt/V.
The association between incremental dialysis, shorter postdialysis recovery times and improved short-term survival may be related to reduced haemodynamic stress as a consequence of less intensive ultrafiltration and reduced length of dialysis sessions. Prospective studies are required to test this hypothesis.
传统血液透析(HD)每周进行三次,每次治疗时间约4小时,未考虑残余肾功能(RKF)。在递增式血液透析中,透析疗程的频率和持续时间根据残余肾功能进行个体化调整。尚无研究比较这两种方法。我们利用最近一项多中心研究的数据,比较了采用递增式血液透析的中心与采用传统方法的其他中心的患者特征和结局。
对英国五个中心的709例接受常规门诊血液透析的患者进行了研究。一个中心采用递增式透析(n = 254),四个中心采用传统血液透析(n = 455)。收集的数据包括人口统计学、合并症、透析参数、常规生化和血液学指标、透析后恢复时间以及贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)评分。对患者进行了至少12个月的随访。
递增式透析中心透析前和透析后的血压、血清钙和磷水平较高,而单次透析的尿素清除率(Kt/Vurea)较低(均P < 0.001),透析后平均血压<100 mmHg的患者比例也较低(P = 0.011)。递增式透析中心的患者从透析疗程中恢复得更快,报告在1小时和4小时内恢复的患者明显更多。在未调整以及调整年龄、性别、种族、透析龄、无尿、癌症病史、心脏病、糖尿病、体重指数、血清白蛋白、BDI-II评分和单次透析Kt/V后,递增式透析中心的短期生存率均显著更高。
递增式透析、较短的透析后恢复时间与改善的短期生存率之间的关联可能与因超滤强度较低和透析疗程时间缩短而导致的血流动力学应激减轻有关。需要进行前瞻性研究来验证这一假设。