Boiron Ludivine, Hopper Kate, Borchers Angela
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences and School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 Mar;29(2):173-179. doi: 10.1111/vec.12819. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
To characterize the clinical features of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), risk factors, and outcome in dogs and cats. The study also aimed to evaluate the current veterinary criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS by comparison of clinical diagnostic criteria with necropsy findings.
Retrospective study.
Fifty-four client-owned animals, 46 dogs and 8 cats.
Medical records were reviewed for patients with the diagnosis of ARDS based on previously published clinical criteria or necropsy diagnosis. Signalment, clinical findings, and outcome were recorded.
Animals were grouped according to a clinical or necropsy diagnosis: 43/54 (80%) were diagnosed with ARDS based on clinical criteria (group 1) and 11/54 (20%) were diagnosed with ARDS based on necropsy only (group 2). In group 1, 22/43 (51%) had a necropsy, which confirmed ARDS in 12/22 (54%). Direct (pulmonary) causes of ARDS were more common than indirect causes in dogs, while cats had a similar occurrence of direct and indirect causes. The most common risk factors identified in dogs were aspiration pneumonia (42%), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (29%), and shock (29%). All cats diagnosed clinically with ARDS had SIRS with or without sepsis. Of the animals with a clinical diagnosis of ARDS, 49% received mechanical ventilation and 58% received treatment (with or without mechanical ventilation) for 24 hours or longer. The overall case fatality rate was 84% in dogs and 100% in cats.
As described in human literature, pneumonia was the most common risk factor in dogs with ARDS, whereas it was SIRS for the cat population. The high mortality rate and discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and necropsy findings may highlight limitations in the clinical criteria for the diagnosis of ARDS and treatment in dogs and cats.
描述犬猫急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的临床特征、危险因素及转归。本研究还旨在通过比较临床诊断标准与尸检结果,评估当前兽医诊断ARDS的标准。
回顾性研究。
54只客户拥有的动物,46只犬和8只猫。
根据先前发表的临床标准或尸检诊断,对诊断为ARDS的患者的病历进行回顾。记录动物特征、临床发现和转归。
根据临床或尸检诊断对动物进行分组:43/54(80%)基于临床标准诊断为ARDS(第1组),11/54(20%)仅基于尸检诊断为ARDS(第2组)。在第1组中,22/43(51%)进行了尸检,其中12/22(54%)确诊为ARDS。犬中ARDS的直接(肺部)病因比间接病因更常见,而猫的直接和间接病因发生率相似。犬中确定的最常见危险因素是吸入性肺炎(42%)、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)(29%)和休克(29%)。所有临床诊断为ARDS的猫均患有SIRS,伴或不伴有败血症。临床诊断为ARDS的动物中,49%接受了机械通气,58%接受了24小时或更长时间的治疗(有或没有机械通气)。犬的总体病死率为84%,猫为100%。
如人类文献所述,肺炎是犬发生ARDS最常见的危险因素,而猫群体中则是SIRS。高死亡率以及临床诊断与尸检结果之间的差异可能凸显了犬猫ARDS临床诊断标准和治疗方法的局限性。