Research School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Faculty of Health, Centre for Applied Psychology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
J Ment Health. 2020 Oct;29(5):506-512. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581326. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Research suggests that blameworthy attributions towards individuals with anorexia nervosa are common, which in turn elicit more stigmatising attitudes towards those with the disorder. The social consensus approach has been found to reduce stigmatising attitudes in various domains and, as such, is a promising avenue to pursue for ameliorating stigma in anorexia nervosa. The present study primarily sought to investigate the effectiveness of a social consensus approach in reducing stigma towards individuals with anorexia nervosa. The study also examined if blameworthy attributions were associated with change in stigma. An experimental design was employed, where female undergraduate students (= 126) completed self-report measures that assessed anorexia nervosa stigma at baseline (Time 1) and 6-10 days after allocation to one of two conditions: social consensus and control (Time 2). The social consensus intervention was more effective than the control condition in reducing stigmatising attitudes on measures assessing affective reactions (= 0.025) and characteristics attributed to a target with anorexia nervosa ( < 0.001). Level of blame-based attributions did not moderate change in stigma. Results suggest that a social consensus intervention is promising irrespective of the endorsement of blameworthy attributions.
研究表明,人们普遍对神经性厌食症患者进行有罪归因,这反过来又导致对该障碍患者产生更多的污名化态度。社会共识方法已被发现可减少各领域的污名化态度,因此,这是改善神经性厌食症污名化的一个很有前途的途径。本研究主要旨在调查社会共识方法对减少对神经性厌食症患者的污名化的有效性。该研究还检查了有罪归因是否与污名化的变化有关。采用了实验设计,其中 126 名女性本科生在基线(第 1 次时间点)和分配到两种条件之一(社会共识和对照组)的 6-10 天后(第 2 次时间点)完成了自我报告的神经性厌食症污名评估量表。与对照组相比,社会共识干预在评估情感反应的措施上更有效地减少了污名化态度(=0.025)和归因于神经性厌食症目标的特征( <0.001)。基于责备的归因水平并没有调节污名化的变化。研究结果表明,无论是否认可有罪归因,社会共识干预都很有前景。