Suppr超能文献

在非典型房扑中,起搏后间期短于心律过速周期长度的部位的电生理和解剖学相关性。

Electrophysiological and Anatomical Correlates of Sites With Postpacing Intervals Shorter Than Tachycardia Cycle Length in Atypical Atrial Flutter.

机构信息

Cardiology Division, University Hospitals of Geneva (N.J., D.C.S., P.B.D., M.N.).

Boston Scientific, Rhythm Management, Solothurn, Switzerland (F.J.).

出版信息

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;12(3):e006955. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006955.

Abstract

Background Although entrainment mapping is an established approach to atypical atrial flutter ablation, postpacing intervals shorter than tachycardia cycle length (difference between postpacing interval and tachycardia cycle length [dPPI] <0 ms) remain of unknown significance. We sought to compare anatomic and electrophysiological properties of sites with dPPI <0, dPPI=0-30, and dPPI >30 ms. Methods We studied 24 noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent macroreentrant atypical atrial flutter in 19 consecutive patients. Ultra high-density electroanatomic activation maps were acquired with a 64-electrode basket catheter. Entrainment mapping was performed at multiple candidate sites. Ablation was performed at the narrowest accessible slow-conducting critical isthmuses. Results Of 102 entrainment mapping sites, dPPI <30 was observed at 72 sites on complete maps of 24 atypical atrial flutter. Compared with dPPI=0-30 sites (N=45), dPPI<0 sites (N=27) were more commonly located within isthmuses <15 mm wide (67% versus 6.7%, P<0.00001; odds ratio, 28.0; 95% CI, 6.8-115.7), more frequently located within 5 mm of the leading wavefront (93% versus 64%, P=0.008), exhibited slower local conduction velocity (0.49±0.43 versus 0.93±0.57 m/s, P=0.0005), lower voltages (0.48±0.79 versus 0.92±0.97 mV, P=0.04), and more frequently fractionated electrograms (67% versus 24%, P=0.0004). High rates of arrhythmia termination or cycle length increase >15 ms by ablation were observed in both dPPI groups (94% versus 86%, P=0.53). Compared with all dPPI <30, dPPI >30 sites (N=30) were less commonly observed within isthmuses (3.3%, P<0.001) or within 5 mm of the leading wavefront (30%, P<0.0001); conduction velocity (1.0±0.7 m/s, P=0.002) and voltage (1.1±1.4 mV, P=0.049) were higher compared with dPPI<0 but similar to dPPI=0-30 sites. Conclusions In atypical atrial flutter, sites with dPPI <0 are markers of limited width critical isthmuses with slower conduction velocity, whereas sites with dPPI=0-30 ms are often not in close proximity to the reentry circuit. Virtual electrode simultaneous down and upstream (antidromic) capture of a confined isthmus of slow conduction can explain a dPPI <0. Identifying these sites may improve selective and efficient ablation strategies compared with the standard 30-ms threshold.

摘要

背景

尽管激动标测是一种成熟的非典型房扑消融方法,但起搏后间期短于心动过速周长(起搏后间期与心动过速周长之差 [dPPI] <0 毫秒)仍然意义不明。我们旨在比较 dPPI<0、dPPI=0-30 和 dPPI>30 毫秒的部位的解剖和电生理特性。

方法

我们研究了 19 例连续患者的 24 例非腔静脉三尖瓣峡部依赖性大折返非典型房扑。使用 64 电极篮状导管获取超高密度电激动标测图。在多个候选部位进行激动标测。在可到达的最窄慢传导临界峡部进行消融。

结果

在 24 例非典型房扑的完整图中,102 个激动标测部位中 dPPI<30 的部位为 72 个。与 dPPI=0-30 部位(N=45)相比,dPPI<0 部位(N=27)更常见于<15mm 宽的峡部(67%与 6.7%,P<0.00001;优势比,28.0;95%CI,6.8-115.7),更靠近激动波前 5mm 内(93%与 64%,P=0.008),局部传导速度较慢(0.49±0.43 与 0.93±0.57m/s,P=0.0005),电压较低(0.48±0.79 与 0.92±0.97mV,P=0.04),电激动图更常呈碎裂(67%与 24%,P=0.0004)。两组 dPPI 均观察到消融后心律失常终止或周长增加>15ms 的高发生率(94%与 86%,P=0.53)。与所有 dPPI<30 相比,dPPI>30 部位(N=30)在峡部内的发生率较低(3.3%,P<0.001)或在激动波前 5mm 内的发生率较低(30%,P<0.0001);传导速度(1.0±0.7m/s,P=0.002)和电压(1.1±1.4mV,P=0.049)高于 dPPI<0,但与 dPPI=0-30 部位相似。

结论

在非典型房扑中,dPPI<0 的部位是狭窄、慢传导临界峡部的标志物,而 dPPI=0-30ms 的部位通常与折返环不接近。局限峡部内的慢传导可解释 dPPI<0 的虚拟电极同时下行和上行(逆行)捕获。与标准 30ms 阈值相比,识别这些部位可能会提高选择性和有效的消融策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验