负压敷料并不优于标准敷料用于开放性骨折。
Negative pressure dressings are no better than standard dressings for open fractures.
机构信息
Bazian, Economist Intelligence Unit healthcare, London, UK
Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
出版信息
BMJ. 2019 Mar 13;364:k4411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4411.
The studyEffect of negative pressure wound therapy vs standard wound management on 12-month disability among adults with severe open fracture of the lower limb: the WOLLF randomised clinical trial.Costa ML, Achten J, Bruce J, et al; UK WOLLF CollaborationPublished on 9 October 2018 2018;319:2280-8.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 10/57/20).To read the full NIHR Signal, go to: https://discover.dc.nihr.ac.uk/content/signal-000655/negative-pressure-dressings-are-no-better-than-standard-dressings-for-open-fractures.
下肢严重开放性骨折成人患者中负压伤口疗法与标准伤口管理对 12 个月残疾影响的研究：WOLLF 随机临床试验。Costa ML, Achten J, Bruce J, 等；英国 WOLLF 协作组 2018 年 10 月 9 日发表于 2018 年；319:2280-8.本研究由英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所卫生技术评估计划（项目编号 10/57/20）资助。欲阅读完整的英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所信号，请访问：https://discover.dc.nihr.ac.uk/content/signal-000655/negative-pressure-dressings-are-no-better-than-standard-dressings-for-open-fractures。
Zotero 插件