• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人切除复杂憩室病的可行性和安全性。

Feasibility and safety of robotic resection of complicated diverticular disease.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4171-4176. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06727-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06727-9
PMID:30868321
Abstract

This study aimed to assess intra- and postoperative outcomes of robotic resection of left-sided complicated diverticular disease. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained institutional database on consecutive patients undergoing elective robotic resection for diverticular disease (2014-2018). All procedures were performed within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). Demographic, surgical and ERP-related items were compared between patients with simple and complicated diverticular disease according to intra-operative presentation. Postoperative complications and length of stay were compared between the two groups. Out of 150 patients, 78 (52%) presented with complicated and the remaining 72 (48%) with uncomplicated disease. Both groups were comparable regarding demographic baseline characteristics and overall ERP compliance. Surgery for complicated disease was longer (288 ± 96 vs. 258 ± 72 min, p = 0.04) and more contaminated (≥ class 3: 57.7 vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001) with a trend to higher conversion rates (10.3 vs. 2.8%, p = 0.1). While postoperative overall complications tended to occur more often after resections for complicated disease (28.2 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.075), major, surgical and medical complications did not differ between the two groups, and median length of stay was 3 days in both settings (p = 0.19). Robotic resection of diverticular disease was feasible and safe regardless of disease presentation by the time of surgery.

摘要

本研究旨在评估机器人左半侧复杂憩室病切除术的围手术期结果。对 2014 年至 2018 年间连续接受择期机器人憩室病切除术的患者进行前瞻性维护的机构数据库进行回顾性分析。所有手术均在强化康复途径 (ERP) 内进行。根据术中表现,比较简单和复杂憩室病患者的人口统计学、手术和 ERP 相关项目。比较两组患者的术后并发症和住院时间。在 150 例患者中,78 例(52%)为复杂憩室病,72 例(48%)为单纯憩室病。两组患者的人口统计学基线特征和整体 ERP 依从性均相似。复杂疾病的手术时间更长(288 ± 96 分钟 vs. 258 ± 72 分钟,p = 0.04),污染程度更高(≥3 级:57.7% vs. 23.6%,p < 0.001),转化率也有升高趋势(10.3% vs. 2.8%,p = 0.1)。尽管术后总体并发症在复杂疾病手术后更常发生(28.2% vs. 15.3%,p = 0.075),但两组之间主要并发症、手术并发症和医疗并发症并无差异,且两种情况下的中位住院时间均为 3 天(p = 0.19)。无论手术时的疾病表现如何,机器人憩室病切除术都是可行且安全的。

相似文献

1
Feasibility and safety of robotic resection of complicated diverticular disease.机器人切除复杂憩室病的可行性和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4171-4176. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06727-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Feasibility and safety of a robotic approach to diverticular disease: a retrospective series of short-term outcomes.机器人手术治疗憩室病的可行性和安全性:一项短期结局的回顾性系列研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jun;93(6):1626-1630. doi: 10.1111/ans.18259. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
3
Robotic elective colectomy for diverticular disease: short-term outcomes of 80 patients.机器人择期结肠切除术治疗憩室病:80 例患者的短期结果。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Apr;17(2):e2204. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2204. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Propensity-Matched Analysis of Sigmoidectomies for Diverticular Disease.乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的倾向匹配分析
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00073.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic resections for diverticular disease.机器人切除憩室病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;24(10):1105-1116. doi: 10.1111/codi.16227. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
6
Robotic pelvic dissection as surgical treatment of complicated diverticulitis in elective settings: a comparative study with fully laparoscopic procedure.机器人盆腔解剖作为择期手术治疗复杂憩室炎的方法:与完全腹腔镜手术的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2583-2590. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6553-x. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Success rates and outcomes of the robotic NICE procedure across complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis cases.机器人 NICE 手术在复杂和非复杂憩室炎病例中的成功率和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6371-6378. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09973-0. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic technique for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.机器人与传统腹腔镜技术治疗左侧结肠憩室病的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;37(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04038-x. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
9
Robotic-assisted surgery for complicated and non-complicated diverticulitis: a single-surgeon case series.机器人辅助手术治疗复杂和非复杂憩室炎:单外科医生病例系列。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Dec;13(6):765-772. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00914-x. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
Laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂憩室病:单中心经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02924.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic pouch excision: unveiling the best approach for optimal outcomes.开腹、腹腔镜与机器人辅助 pouch 切除术:探寻最佳方法以获得最佳疗效。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Oct 15;28(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02999-z.
2
Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis.我们是否应该鼓励在复杂性憩室炎中使用机器人技术?系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Sep 13;10:1208611. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1208611. eCollection 2023.
3
Enhanced Recovery: A Decade of Experience and Future Prospects at the Mayo Clinic.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical teaching does not increase the risk of intraoperative adverse events.外科教学不会增加术中不良事件的风险。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1715-1722. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3143-2. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Diverticular Disease.憩室病的流行病学与病理生理学
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018 Jul;31(4):209-213. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607464. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
3
Robotic Platform for an IPAA.用于 IPAA 的机器人平台。
加速康复:梅奥诊所十年经验与未来展望
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 8;9(5):549. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050549.
4
The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years.机器人结肠切除术的艺术:过去 5 年进展综述。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1037-1048. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00969-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy for left-sided colon cancers: a retrospective study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助左半结肠癌切除术的围手术期和长期结果:一项回顾性研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00959-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jul;61(7):869-874. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001125.
4
Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?行机器人辅助直肠癌切除术的患者,手术时间延长是否会影响术后发病率?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3659-3666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6098-z. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗乙状结肠憩室炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.
6
Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for malignancy.用于恶性肿瘤的机器人辅助右半结肠切除术并体内吻合术
J Robot Surg. 2018 Sep;12(3):461-466. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0759-0. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
7
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
8
First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback.使用具有触觉反馈的新型机器人平台进行结直肠手术的首次经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep 14. doi: 10.1111/codi.13882.
9
Early elective versus delayed elective surgery in acute recurrent diverticulitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性复发性憩室炎的早期择期手术与延迟择期手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Oct;46:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.583. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Participation of Colon and Rectal Fellows in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: Effect on Surgical Outcomes.结肠直肠专科住院医师参与机器人直肠癌手术:对手术结果的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar-Apr;75(2):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 15.