• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 2012-2016 年北爱尔兰社区和医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的流行病学:人群数据关联和病例对照研究。

Comparing the epidemiology of community- and hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infections in Northern Ireland, 2012-2016: a population data linkage and case-case study.

机构信息

Public Health Agency, Health Protection Service Northern Ireland,Belfast,Northern Ireland.

Statistics Unit, Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department,Public Health England,Colindale,England.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e141. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000414.

DOI:10.1017/S0950268819000414
PMID:30869054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6518519/
Abstract

The burden of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection (CA-CDI) has increased. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of CA-CDI to inform future interventions. We used population-based linked surveillance data from 2012 to 2016 to describe socio-demographic factors, ribotype and mortality for all CA (n = 1303) and hospital-associated (HA, n = 1356) CDI. For 483 community-onset (CO) CA-CDI and 287 COHA-CDI cases, a questionnaire on risk factors was completed and we conducted a case-case study using logistic regression models for univariate and multivariable analysis. CA-CDI cases had lower odds of being male (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.87; P < 0.001), and higher odds of living in rural rather than urban settlement (AOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1; P = 0.05) compared with HA-CDI cases. The distribution of ribotypes was similar in both groups with RT078 being most prevalent. CDI-specific death was lower in CA-CDI than HA-CDI (7% vs. 11%, P < 0.001). COCA-CDI had lower odds of having had an outpatient appointment in the previous 4 weeks compared with COHA-CDI (AOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.9, P = 0.01) and lower odds of being in a care home or hospice when compared with their own home, than COHA-CDI (AOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45-0.98 and AOR 0.35; 95% CI 0.13-0.92, P = 0.02). Exposure to gastric acid suppressants (50% in COCA-CDI and 55% in COHA-CDI) and antimicrobial therapy (18% in COCA-CDI and 20% in COHA-CDI) prior to CDI was similar. Our analysis of community-onset cases suggests that other risk factors for COHA-CDI may be equally important for COCA-CDI. Opportunities to safely reduce antibiotic and gastric acid suppressants use should be investigated in all healthcare settings.

摘要

社区获得性艰难梭菌感染(CA-CDI)的负担增加了。我们旨在描述 CA-CDI 的流行病学,以为未来的干预措施提供信息。我们使用了 2012 年至 2016 年基于人群的关联监测数据,描述了所有 CA(n=1303)和医院相关(HA,n=1356)CDI 的社会人口统计学因素、核糖体型和死亡率。对于 483 例社区发病(CO)CA-CDI 和 287 例 COHA-CDI 病例,我们完成了一份关于危险因素的调查问卷,并使用逻辑回归模型进行了病例对照研究,进行了单变量和多变量分析。与 HA-CDI 病例相比,CA-CDI 病例的男性发病几率较低(调整后的优势比(AOR)0.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.58-0.87;P < 0.001),而农村地区的发病几率较高(AOR 1.5,95%CI 1.1-2.1;P=0.05)。两组的核糖体型分布相似,以 RT078 最为常见。与 HA-CDI 相比,CA-CDI 的 CDI 特异性死亡率较低(7%比 11%,P < 0.001)。与 COHA-CDI 相比,COCA-CDI 发病前 4 周有门诊就诊的几率较低(AOR 0.61;95%CI 0.41-0.9,P=0.01),与自己的家相比,COCA-CDI 更有可能在疗养院或临终关怀院(AOR 0.66;95%CI 0.45-0.98 和 AOR 0.35;95%CI 0.13-0.92,P=0.02)。发病前使用胃酸抑制剂(COCA-CDI 中为 50%,COHA-CDI 中为 55%)和抗菌治疗(COCA-CDI 中为 18%,COHA-CDI 中为 20%)的比例相似。对社区发病病例的分析表明,COHA-CDI 的其他危险因素可能对 COCA-CDI 同样重要。在所有医疗保健环境中,都应调查安全减少抗生素和胃酸抑制剂使用的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/a0fd43711090/S0950268819000414_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/398694309f9a/S0950268819000414_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/0d966bac8de2/S0950268819000414_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/a0fd43711090/S0950268819000414_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/398694309f9a/S0950268819000414_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/0d966bac8de2/S0950268819000414_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/6518519/a0fd43711090/S0950268819000414_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the epidemiology of community- and hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infections in Northern Ireland, 2012-2016: a population data linkage and case-case study.比较 2012-2016 年北爱尔兰社区和医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的流行病学:人群数据关联和病例对照研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e141. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000414.
2
Enhanced surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection occurring outside hospital, England, 2011 to 2013.强化监测英格兰地区 2011 至 2013 年发生在医院外的艰难梭菌感染。
Euro Surveill. 2016 Jul 21;21(29). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.29.30295.
3
Increasing prevalence of the epidemic ribotype 106 in healthcare facility-associated and community-associated Clostridioides difficile infection.流行株 106 在医疗机构相关性和社区相关性艰难梭菌感染中的流行率不断增加。
Anaerobe. 2019 Feb;55:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
4
A prospective study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infections: the role of antibiotics and co-infections.一项社区相关性艰难梭菌感染的前瞻性研究:抗生素和合并感染的作用。
J Infect. 2014 Aug;69(2):134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
Distinguishing community-associated from hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infections in children: implications for public health surveillance.区分儿童社区获得性和医院获得性艰难梭菌感染:对公共卫生监测的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;57(12):1665-72. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit581. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
Clinical and molecular characteristics of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infections in comparison with those of hospital-acquired C. difficile.社区获得性艰难梭菌感染与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的临床和分子特征比较
Anaerobe. 2017 Dec;48:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
7
Comparison of Clostridium difficile Ribotypes Circulating in Australian Hospitals and Communities.澳大利亚医院和社区中艰难梭菌核糖型的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec 28;55(1):216-225. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01779-16. Print 2017 Jan.
8
Incidence and Risk Factors for Community and Hospital Acquisition of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.特拉维夫索罗卡医疗中心社区及医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的发病率和危险因素
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;38(8):912-920. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.82. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
The emergence of community-onset Clostridium difficile infection in a tertiary hospital in Singapore: a cause for concern.新加坡一家 tertiary 医院出现社区获得性艰难梭菌感染:值得关注。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jan;43(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
10
Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection in emergency department patients in Western Australia.西澳大利亚急诊科患者的社区相关性艰难梭菌感染
Anaerobe. 2017 Dec;48:121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Global Burden of Infections, 2016-2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.2016 - 2024年全球感染负担:系统评价与荟萃分析
Infect Dis Rep. 2025 Apr 14;17(2):31. doi: 10.3390/idr17020031.
2
Epidemiologic profile of community-acquired infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社区获得性感染的流行病学概况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Infect. 2025 Mar 4;153:e46. doi: 10.1017/S0950268825000202.
3
Association between ribotype and clinical form of enterocolitis with in Western Romania: A 2-year study.罗马尼亚西部肠炎的核糖体分型与临床类型之间的关联:一项为期两年的研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Preliminary studies on isolates of Clostridium difficile from dogs and exotic pets.来自犬类和外来宠物的艰难梭菌分离株的初步研究。
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Mar 9;14(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1402-7.
2
Community-acquired Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, ribotype, risk factors, hospital and intensive care unit outcomes, and current and emerging therapies.社区获得性艰难梭菌:流行病学、核糖体分型、危险因素、医院和重症监护病房结局以及现有和新兴治疗方法。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
Comparative genome and phenotypic analysis of three Clostridioides difficile strains isolated from a single patient provide insight into multiple infection of C. difficile.
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jan;23(1):22. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10944. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Risk Factors Associated with Recurrent Infection.与复发性感染相关的危险因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 21;8(3):352. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030352.
对从单一患者中分离出的三株艰难梭菌的比较基因组和表型分析为艰难梭菌的多次感染提供了深入了解。
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jan 2;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4368-0.
4
How to: Surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections.方法:艰难梭菌感染的监测。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
Inpatient Proton Pump Inhibitor Administration and Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection: Evidence and Possible Mechanism.住院患者质子泵抑制剂的使用与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染:证据与可能的机制。
Am J Med. 2018 Mar;131(3):244-249. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.034. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Updated meta-analysis of controlled observational studies: proton-pump inhibitors and risk of Clostridium difficile infection.更新的对照观察研究荟萃分析:质子泵抑制剂与艰难梭菌感染的风险。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Jan;98(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
7
Clinical and molecular characteristics of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infections in comparison with those of hospital-acquired C. difficile.社区获得性艰难梭菌感染与医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的临床和分子特征比较
Anaerobe. 2017 Dec;48:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
8
Identification of novel risk factors for community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection using spatial statistics and geographic information system analyses.使用空间统计和地理信息系统分析确定社区获得性艰难梭菌感染的新风险因素。
PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0176285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176285. eCollection 2017.
9
Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study.英格兰控制干预措施对艰难梭菌感染的影响:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17(4):411-421. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30514-X. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Dissemination of Clostridium difficile in food and the environment: Significant sources of C. difficile community-acquired infection?艰难梭菌在食物和环境中的传播:艰难梭菌社区获得性感染的重要来源?
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Mar;122(3):542-553. doi: 10.1111/jam.13338. Epub 2016 Dec 14.