• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 ACMG-AMP 框架进行调整以解释 MEN1 错义变异的建议。

Proposition of adjustments to the ACMG-AMP framework for the interpretation of MEN1 missense variants.

机构信息

Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, INSERM, MMG, Laboratory of Molecular Biology Hospital La Conception, Marseille, France.

CHU Lille, Service de Biochimie et Biologie moléculaire "Hormonologie, Métabolisme-Nutrition, Oncologie", F-59037 Lille, France.

出版信息

Hum Mutat. 2019 Jun;40(6):661-674. doi: 10.1002/humu.23746. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1002/humu.23746
PMID:30869828
Abstract

In 2015, the ACMG-AMP guidelines provided a general procedure for the objective and reproducible classification of genomic variants. While the benefits of this framework are of major importance, its adaptation for locus-specific use is needed. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) occurs due to inactivating mutations in the tumour suppressor gene MEN1, including 20% of missense variants. The classification of these variants may be extremely challenging. Here, we compared the interpretation of the 122 MEN1 missense variants, identified in the French population over the past 15 years by the TENGEN network (French oncogenetics network of neuroendocrine tumors) versus by using the ACMG-AMP guidelines, and analyzed the causes of discordance. A total of 59.8% of missense variants were termed as (likely)-pathogenic variants by TENGEN versus only 28.7% using ACMG-AMP guidelines. Actually, 53.4% (39/73) of TENGEN (likely)-pathogenic variants were declassified in variant of uncertain significance (VUS) by using ACMG-AMP guidelines, thereby affecting the clinical management of patients and their families. Twenty of these ACMG-AMP VUS were found in patients with a clinically authentic MEN1 disease. Here, TENGEN proposes adjustments to the ACMG-AMP framework for the interpretation of MEN1 missense variants. These propositions merge both the classification systems, and are particularly interesting, as MEN1 is included in the ACMG secondary findings list for reporting in clinical genomic sequencing.

摘要

2015 年,ACMG-AMP 指南为客观和可重复的基因组变异分类提供了一般程序。虽然该框架的好处非常重要,但需要适应特定于基因座的使用。多发性内分泌肿瘤 1 型(MEN1)是由于肿瘤抑制基因 MEN1 的失活突变引起的,包括 20%的错义变异。这些变异的分类可能极具挑战性。在这里,我们比较了过去 15 年由 TENGEN 网络(法国神经内分泌肿瘤肿瘤遗传学网络)在法国人群中鉴定的 122 个 MEN1 错义变异的解释与使用 ACMG-AMP 指南的解释,并分析了不一致的原因。TENGEN 将 59.8%的错义变异称为(可能)致病性变异,而 ACMG-AMP 指南仅将 28.7%的错义变异称为致病性变异。实际上,53.4%(39/73)的 TENGEN(可能)致病性变异在使用 ACMG-AMP 指南时被归类为意义不明的变异(VUS),从而影响了患者及其家属的临床管理。在这些 ACMG-AMP VUS 中,有 20 个是在有临床确诊的 MEN1 疾病的患者中发现的。在这里,TENGEN 对 ACMG-AMP 框架提出了 MEN1 错义变异解释的调整。这些提议合并了两个分类系统,特别有趣,因为 MEN1 被列入 ACMG 用于临床基因组测序报告的次要发现列表。

相似文献

1
Proposition of adjustments to the ACMG-AMP framework for the interpretation of MEN1 missense variants.对 ACMG-AMP 框架进行调整以解释 MEN1 错义变异的建议。
Hum Mutat. 2019 Jun;40(6):661-674. doi: 10.1002/humu.23746. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
2
UMD-MEN1 Database: An Overview of the 370 MEN1 Variants Present in 1676 Patients From the French Population.UMD-MEN1 数据库:法国人群 1676 例患者中 370 种 MEN1 变异的概述。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Mar 1;104(3):753-764. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01170.
3
A Japanese Family Meeting the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for MEN1 with a MEN1 Variant of Uncertain Significance.一个符合MEN1临床诊断标准且携带意义未明的MEN1变异体的日本家庭。
Intern Med. 2024 Apr 15;63(8):1119-1123. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2300-23. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework.将 ACMG/AMP 变异分类指南建模为贝叶斯分类框架。
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):1054-1060. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.210. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.临床测序探索性研究联盟中九个实验室对ACMG-AMP变异解读指南的执行情况。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.使用 ACMG-AMP 变异解释指南对九个基因组实施研究进行变异分类一致性评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):932-941. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Application of an intracellular stability test of a novel missense menin mutant to the diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.新型错义突变 menin 细胞内稳定性试验在 1 型多发性内分泌肿瘤诊断中的应用。
Endocr J. 2012;59(12):1093-8. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0145. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
8
Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.使用包含同源重组修复(HDR)功能测定的 ACMG/AMP 模型对 BRCA2 意义未明变异(VUS)进行分类。
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 1;28(17):3742-3751. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0203.
9
Evaluation of in silico algorithms for use with ACMG/AMP clinical variant interpretation guidelines.评估 ACMG/AMP 临床变异解读指南中使用的计算机算法。
Genome Biol. 2017 Nov 28;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1353-5.
10
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 associated with a new germline Men1 mutation in a family with atypical tumor phenotype.1 型多发性内分泌腺瘤病伴家族性非典型肿瘤表型新种系 Men1 突变。
Hormones (Athens). 2016 Jan-Mar;15(1):113-7. doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.1626.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Landscape and Clinical Manifestations of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 in a Korean Cohort: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.韩国队列中1型多发性内分泌腺瘤病的遗传特征和临床表现:一项多中心回顾性分析
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2024 Dec;39(6):956-964. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2024.2008. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Analysis of Bone Phenotype Differences in MEN1-Related and Sporadic Primary Hyperparathyroidism Using 3D-DXA.使用三维双能X线吸收法分析与MEN1相关的和散发性原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的骨表型差异
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 25;13(21):6382. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216382.
3
Challenges in molecular diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia.
多种内分泌肿瘤的分子诊断挑战。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 27;15:1445633. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1445633. eCollection 2024.
4
A Japanese Family Meeting the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for MEN1 with a MEN1 Variant of Uncertain Significance.一个符合MEN1临床诊断标准且携带意义未明的MEN1变异体的日本家庭。
Intern Med. 2024 Apr 15;63(8):1119-1123. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2300-23. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
DICER1 platform domain missense variants inhibit miRNA biogenesis and lead to tumor susceptibility.DICER1平台结构域错义变体抑制微小RNA生物合成并导致肿瘤易感性。
NAR Cancer. 2023 Jun 16;5(3):zcad030. doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcad030. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Genetics of monogenic disorders of calcium and bone metabolism.单基因钙代谢和骨代谢紊乱的遗传学。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2022 Oct;97(4):483-501. doi: 10.1111/cen.14644. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
7
Massive parallel sequencing in individuals with multiple primary tumours reveals the benefit of re-analysis.对患有多种原发性肿瘤的个体进行大规模平行测序揭示了重新分析的益处。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Oct 28;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00203-z.
8
Detecting Causal Variants in Mendelian Disorders Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.使用全基因组测序检测孟德尔疾病中的因果变异。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2243:1-25. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1103-6_1.
9
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Latest Insights.多发性内分泌腺瘤病 1 型:最新见解。
Endocr Rev. 2021 Mar 15;42(2):133-170. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa031.
10
Findings from a Genotyping Study of Over 1000 People with Inherited Retinal Disorders in Ireland.爱尔兰一项针对 1000 多名遗传性视网膜疾病患者的基因分型研究结果。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jan 16;11(1):105. doi: 10.3390/genes11010105.