Suppr超能文献

慢性踝关节不稳患者接受松动治疗后背屈和动态姿势控制的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Changes in Dorsiflexion and Dynamic Postural Control After Mobilizations in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute. Dr Gaven is now with the College of Health Sciences, University of Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2019 Apr;54(4):403-417. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-380-17. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of joint mobilizations for improving dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM) and dynamic postural control in individuals with chronic ankle instability.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to January 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies examined the isolated effects of joint mobilizations to enhance DFROM and dynamic postural control in individuals with chronic ankle instability and provided adequate data to calculate effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators independently assessed the methodologic quality, level of evidence, and strength of recommendation using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy. We extracted the sample sizes, means, and standard deviations for DFROM and dynamic postural control and filtered the data based on control-to-intervention and preintervention-to-postintervention (pre-post) comparisons.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We included 7 level 1 and 3 level 2 studies that had a median Physiotherapy Evidence Database score of 60% (range = 40%-80%). The magnitudes of control-to-intervention and pre-post differences were examined using bias-corrected Hedges ESs. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome measure and comparison. Positive ESs indicated better outcome scores in the intervention group than in the control group and at postintervention than at preintervention. The α level was set at .05. Meta-analysis revealed weak and moderate ESs for overall control-to-intervention (ES = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.14, 0.68; = .003) and pre-post (ES = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.20, 0.48; < .001) DFROM analyses. Overall, dynamic postural control meta-analysis revealed moderate control-to-intervention (ES = 0.42; 95% CI = -0.14, 0.98; = .14) and weak and moderate ESs for pre-post (ES = 0.37; 95% CI = -0.12, 0.87; = .14) analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed grade A evidence that joint mobilizations can mildly improve DFROM among individuals with chronic ankle instability compared with controls and preintervention. We observed grade B evidence that indicated conflicting effects of joint mobilizations on dynamic postural control compared with controls and preintervention.

摘要

目的

进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估关节松动术对改善慢性踝关节不稳定患者背屈活动度(DFROM)和动态姿势控制的效果。

资料来源

从创建到 2017 年 1 月,电子数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 SPORTDiscus)进行了搜索。

研究选择

纳入的研究单独评估了关节松动术对慢性踝关节不稳定患者背屈活动度和动态姿势控制的增强作用,并提供了足够的数据来计算效应量(ES)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

资料提取

两名研究人员使用物理治疗证据数据库量表和推荐强度分类法独立评估方法学质量、证据水平和推荐强度。我们提取了 DFROM 和动态姿势控制的样本量、均值和标准差,并根据对照干预和干预前-干预后(预-后)比较对数据进行了过滤。

资料综合

我们纳入了 7 项 1 级和 3 项 2 级研究,这些研究的物理治疗证据数据库评分中位数为 60%(范围=40%-80%)。使用偏倚校正的 Hedges ES 检查了对照干预和预-后差异的大小。对每个结果测量和比较进行了随机效应荟萃分析。阳性 ES 表示干预组的结果评分优于对照组和干预后优于干预前。α 水平设定为.05。荟萃分析显示,在总体对照干预(ES=0.41;95%CI=0.14,0.68; =.003)和预-后(ES=0.34;95%CI=0.20,0.48; <.001)DFROM 分析中,ES 为弱和中度。总体而言,动态姿势控制荟萃分析显示,在对照干预(ES=0.42;95%CI=-0.14,0.98; =.14)和预-后(ES=0.37;95%CI=-0.12,0.87; =.14)分析中,ES 为弱和中度。

结论

我们观察到 A 级证据表明,与对照组和干预前相比,关节松动术可轻度改善慢性踝关节不稳定患者的 DFROM。我们观察到 B 级证据表明,与对照组和干预前相比,关节松动术对动态姿势控制的影响存在矛盾。

相似文献

3
Effects of joint mobilization on chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):601-10. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.935877. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
8
Contributing factors to star excursion balance test performance in individuals with chronic ankle instability.
Gait Posture. 2015 May;41(4):912-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
10
Ankle-Joint Self-Mobilization and CrossFit Training in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Athl Train. 2020 Feb;55(2):159-168. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-181-18. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Increased Femoral Neck Anteversion is Prevalent in Male Elite Youth Soccer Players with Chronic Ankle Instability.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Aug 25;58(12):1852-1860. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01245-w. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Effects of plantar-sensory treatments on postural control in chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 27;18(6):e0287689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287689. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion influences Lateral Step Down Test scores in individuals with chronic ankle instability.
Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jan;23:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
3
Sensory-Targeted Ankle Rehabilitation Strategies for Chronic Ankle Instability.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 May;48(5):776-84. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000859.
4
Weight-Bearing Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability.
J Athl Train. 2015 Aug;50(8):833-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.5.07. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic ankle instability.
J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):758-63. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.54.
7
Effects of joint mobilization on chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):601-10. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.935877. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
The effect of two mobilization techniques on dorsiflexion in people with chronic ankle instability.
Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Feb;16(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验