Howard-Anderson Jessica, Schwab Kristin E, Chang Sandy, Wilhalme Holly, Graber Christopher J, Quinn Roswell
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Jun 26;6(2):157-163. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0066.
Background Scant data exists to guide the work-up for fever in hospitalized patients, and little is known about what diagnostic tests medicine residents order for such patients. We sought to analyze how cross-covering medicine residents address fever and how sign-out systems affect their response. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate febrile episodes that residents responded to overnight. Primary outcomes included diagnostic tests ordered, if an in-person evaluation occurred, and the effect of sign-out instructions that advised a "full fever work-up" (FFWU). Results Investigators reviewed 253 fevers in 155 patients; sign-out instructions were available for 204 fevers. Residents evaluated the patient in person in 29 (11%) episodes. The most common tests ordered were: blood cultures (48%), urinalysis (UA) with reflex culture (34%), and chest X-ray (30%). If the sign-out advised an FFWU, residents were more likely to order blood cultures [odds ratio (OR) 14.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.52-28.90], UA with reflex culture (OR 12.07, 95% CI 5.56-23.23), chest X-ray (OR 16.55, 95% CI 7.03-39.94), lactate (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.47-7.55), and complete blood count (CBC) (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.17-8.51). In a multivariable regression, predictors of the number of tests ordered included hospital location, resident training level, timing of previous blood culture, in-person evaluation, escalation to a higher level of care, and sign-out instructions. Conclusions Sign-out instructions and a few patient factors significantly impacted cross-cover resident diagnostic test ordering for overnight fevers. This practice can be targeted in resident education to improve diagnostic reasoning and stewardship.
背景 目前几乎没有数据可用于指导住院患者发热的检查工作,对于内科住院医师针对此类患者开具何种诊断检查也知之甚少。我们试图分析参与交叉值班的内科住院医师如何处理发热情况以及交班系统如何影响他们的应对措施。方法 我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估住院医师在夜间应对的发热事件。主要结局包括开具的诊断检查、是否进行了亲自评估以及建议进行“全面发热检查”(FFWU)的交班指示的影响。结果 研究人员审查了155例患者的253次发热情况;有204次发热的交班指示可供参考。住院医师亲自评估患者的有29例(11%)。最常开具的检查是:血培养(48%)、尿分析(UA)及反射性培养(34%)和胸部X线检查(30%)。如果交班指示建议进行FFWU,住院医师更有可能开具血培养[比值比(OR)14.75,95%置信区间(CI)7.52 - 28.90]、UA及反射性培养(OR 12.07,95%CI 5.56 - 23.23)、胸部X线检查(OR 16.55,95%CI 7.03 - 39.94)、乳酸(OR 3.33,95%CI 1.47 - 7.55)和全血细胞计数(CBC)(OR 3.16,95%CI 1.17 - 8.51)。在多变量回归分析中,开具检查数量的预测因素包括医院位置、住院医师培训水平、上次血培养时间、亲自评估、升级到更高护理级别以及交班指示。结论 交班指示和一些患者因素显著影响了参与交叉值班的住院医师对夜间发热情况的诊断检查开具。这种做法可作为住院医师教育的重点,以改善诊断推理和管理。