Suppr超能文献

内科住院医师对夜间发热情况的评估。

Internal medicine residents' evaluation of fevers overnight.

作者信息

Howard-Anderson Jessica, Schwab Kristin E, Chang Sandy, Wilhalme Holly, Graber Christopher J, Quinn Roswell

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Jun 26;6(2):157-163. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0066.

Abstract

Background Scant data exists to guide the work-up for fever in hospitalized patients, and little is known about what diagnostic tests medicine residents order for such patients. We sought to analyze how cross-covering medicine residents address fever and how sign-out systems affect their response. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate febrile episodes that residents responded to overnight. Primary outcomes included diagnostic tests ordered, if an in-person evaluation occurred, and the effect of sign-out instructions that advised a "full fever work-up" (FFWU). Results Investigators reviewed 253 fevers in 155 patients; sign-out instructions were available for 204 fevers. Residents evaluated the patient in person in 29 (11%) episodes. The most common tests ordered were: blood cultures (48%), urinalysis (UA) with reflex culture (34%), and chest X-ray (30%). If the sign-out advised an FFWU, residents were more likely to order blood cultures [odds ratio (OR) 14.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.52-28.90], UA with reflex culture (OR 12.07, 95% CI 5.56-23.23), chest X-ray (OR 16.55, 95% CI 7.03-39.94), lactate (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.47-7.55), and complete blood count (CBC) (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.17-8.51). In a multivariable regression, predictors of the number of tests ordered included hospital location, resident training level, timing of previous blood culture, in-person evaluation, escalation to a higher level of care, and sign-out instructions. Conclusions Sign-out instructions and a few patient factors significantly impacted cross-cover resident diagnostic test ordering for overnight fevers. This practice can be targeted in resident education to improve diagnostic reasoning and stewardship.

摘要

背景 目前几乎没有数据可用于指导住院患者发热的检查工作,对于内科住院医师针对此类患者开具何种诊断检查也知之甚少。我们试图分析参与交叉值班的内科住院医师如何处理发热情况以及交班系统如何影响他们的应对措施。方法 我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估住院医师在夜间应对的发热事件。主要结局包括开具的诊断检查、是否进行了亲自评估以及建议进行“全面发热检查”(FFWU)的交班指示的影响。结果 研究人员审查了155例患者的253次发热情况;有204次发热的交班指示可供参考。住院医师亲自评估患者的有29例(11%)。最常开具的检查是:血培养(48%)、尿分析(UA)及反射性培养(34%)和胸部X线检查(30%)。如果交班指示建议进行FFWU,住院医师更有可能开具血培养[比值比(OR)14.75,95%置信区间(CI)7.52 - 28.90]、UA及反射性培养(OR 12.07,95%CI 5.56 - 23.23)、胸部X线检查(OR 16.55,95%CI 7.03 - 39.94)、乳酸(OR 3.33,95%CI 1.47 - 7.55)和全血细胞计数(CBC)(OR 3.16,95%CI 1.17 - 8.51)。在多变量回归分析中,开具检查数量的预测因素包括医院位置、住院医师培训水平、上次血培养时间、亲自评估、升级到更高护理级别以及交班指示。结论 交班指示和一些患者因素显著影响了参与交叉值班的住院医师对夜间发热情况的诊断检查开具。这种做法可作为住院医师教育的重点,以改善诊断推理和管理。

相似文献

1
Internal medicine residents' evaluation of fevers overnight.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Jun 26;6(2):157-163. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0066.
2
Use of an appreciative inquiry approach to improve resident sign-out in an era of multiple shift changes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(3):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1885-4. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
5
Reducing the number of unnecessary routine laboratory tests through education of internal medicine residents.
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Dec;94(1118):716-719. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135784. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

2
Provider & nursing perspectives on the "panculture": opportunities for innovative diagnostic stewardship interventions.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Nov 11;4(1):e195. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.451. eCollection 2024.
3
Every Crisis Is an Opportunity: Advancing Blood Culture Stewardship During a Blood Culture Bottle Shortage.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 23;11(9):ofae479. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae479. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Blood culture utilization practices among febrile and/or hypothermic inpatients.
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07748-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2418-2430. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx194.
2
Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Oct;177(10):1420-1421. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3628. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
3
Diagnostic Stewardship-Leveraging the Laboratory to Improve Antimicrobial Use.
JAMA. 2017 Aug 15;318(7):607-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8531.
5
Choosing Wisely Overnight? Residents' Approach to Fever.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 19;4(2):ofx080. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx080. eCollection 2017 Spring.
6
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
7
Culture if spikes? Indications and yield of blood cultures in hospitalized medical patients.
J Hosp Med. 2016 May;11(5):336-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2541. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host.
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(3):309-18. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit816.
9
Sign-out snapshot: cross-sectional evaluation of written sign-outs among specialties.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan;23(1):66-72. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002164. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
10
When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii6-ii10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001621. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验