Bischoff Joachim, Barinoff Jana, Mundhenke Christoph, Bauerschlag Dirk O, Costa Serban-Dan, Herr Daniel, Lübbe Kristina, Marmé Frederik, Maass Nicolai, von Minckwitz Gunter, Grischke Eva-Maria, Müller Volkmar, Schmidt Marcus, Gerber Bernd, Kümmel Sherko, Schumacher Claudia, Krabisch Petra, Seiler Sabine, Thill Marc, Nekljudova Valentina, Loibl Sibylle
Women's Hospital, Städtisches Klinikum Dessau.
Women's Hospital, Agaplesion Markus-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main.
Anticancer Drugs. 2019 Apr;30(4):394-401. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000722.
The E-VITA study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two schedules of eribulin and lapatinib in patients with trastuzumab-pretreated HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer. This multicenter, open-label phase II trial, randomly assigned patients with trastuzumab-pretreated HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer to lapatinib 1000 mg daily with eribulin 1.23 mg/m (equivalent to 1.4 mg/m eribulin mesylate) days 1+8 every 21 days (split-dose arm) or eribulin 1.76 mg/m (equivalent to 2.0 mg/m eribulin mesylate) day 1 every 21 days (3-weekly arm). Time to progression and tolerability were defined as primary end points; no sample size calculation for formal comparison of efficacy data has been performed. Secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and overall survival. Overall, 43 patients of a planned number of 80 patients were recruited. At a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the median time to progression was 8.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.8-9.4] in the split-dose arm and 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.6-13.4) in the 3-weekly arm. Objective response rate was 52.4% (95% CI: 31.0-73.7) in the split-dose arm and 45.0% (95% CI: 23.2-66.8) in the 3-weekly arm, and clinical benefit rate was 71.4% (95% CI: 52.1-90.8) and 75.0% (95% CI: 56.0-94.0), respectively. Overall survival was also similar in both arms. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (58.5%) and leukopenia (39.0%). The combination of eribulin and lapatinib showed an acceptable safety profile with less toxicity observed in the eribulin 1.23 mg/m day 1+8 group. This might be an alternative regimen when other treatment options are exhausted. Therefore, further clinical studies are warranted.
E-VITA研究评估了两种艾日布林与拉帕替尼给药方案对曲妥珠单抗预处理的HER-2阳性转移性乳腺癌患者的疗效和耐受性。这项多中心、开放标签的II期试验,将曲妥珠单抗预处理的HER-2阳性转移性乳腺癌患者随机分配至每日服用1000mg拉帕替尼,同时在每21天的第1天和第8天服用1.23mg/m²艾日布林(相当于1.4mg/m²甲磺酸艾日布林)的分组给药组,或每21天的第1天服用1.76mg/m²艾日布林(相当于2.0mg/m²甲磺酸艾日布林)的3周给药组。将疾病进展时间和耐受性定义为主要终点;未进行样本量计算以对疗效数据进行正式比较。次要终点包括客观缓解率、临床获益率和总生存期。总体而言,计划招募的80名患者中有43名入组。在中位随访28.7个月时,分组给药组的疾病进展中位时间为8.1个月[95%置信区间(CI):4.8 - 9.4],3周给药组为6.5个月(95% CI:4.6 - 13.4)。分组给药组的客观缓解率为52.4%(95% CI:31.0 - 73.7),3周给药组为45.0%(95% CI:23.2 - 66.8),临床获益率分别为71.4%(95% CI:52.1 - 90.8)和75.0%(95% CI:56.0 - 94.0)。两组的总生存期也相似。最常见的3 - 4级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少(58.5%)和白细胞减少(39.0%)。艾日布林与拉帕替尼联合使用显示出可接受的安全性,在1.23mg/m²艾日布林第1天 + 第8天组观察到的毒性较小。当其他治疗选择用尽时,这可能是一种替代方案。因此,有必要进行进一步的临床研究。