Suppr超能文献

脑膜炎球菌病暴发的管理:我们是否使用相同的语言?对低发病率国家与高收入国家的公共卫生政策的比较。

Management of meningococcal outbreaks: are we using the same language? Comparison of the public health policies between high-income countries with low incidence of meningococcal disease.

机构信息

a Department of Hygiene and Public Health , Local Health Unit 3 Serenissima , Venice , Italy.

b Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences , University of Bologna , Bologna , Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 May;18(5):559-574. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1595595. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in high-income countries usually occurs sporadically with low incidence and occasionally as small clusters or outbreaks. The WHO guidelines (GLs) for IMD outbreak applies only to African countries with high endemic incidence. Several high-income countries developed their own GLs on IMD outbreak, and we compare their terminology, classification, definitions, and public health interventions.

METHODS

National IMD outbreak GLs of the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member states were compared. Due to linguistic barriers, 17 out of forty-one countries were selected, and the GLs on the websites of the national health authorities were independently screened by two researchers.

RESULTS

National GLs on IMD outbreak were available for 12 countries. All GLs classify IMD outbreak into organization and community based using different terminology (cluster, epidemic, etc.). Two GLs introduce also a third condition of hyperendemic. Definitions, thresholds, and countermeasures vary among countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Different definitions of organization and community-based outbreaks and countermeasures are expected because of uncertainties about their effectiveness, and differences between countries in health-care systems and public health policy approaches. Nevertheless, variations in terminology, definitions and countermeasures are confusing and reflect the need for an international standardization.

摘要

背景

在高收入国家,侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病(IMD)通常呈散发状态,发病率较低,偶尔呈小集群或暴发。世界卫生组织(WHO)关于 IMD 暴发的指南(GL)仅适用于发病率高的非洲国家。一些高收入国家制定了自己的 IMD 暴发 GL,我们比较了它们的术语、分类、定义和公共卫生干预措施。

方法

比较了欧盟和经济合作与发展组织成员国的国家 IMD 暴发 GL。由于语言障碍,从 41 个国家中选择了 17 个,国家卫生当局网站上的 GL 由两名研究人员独立筛选。

结果

12 个国家提供了国家 IMD 暴发 GL。所有 GL 都使用不同的术语(集群、流行等)将 IMD 暴发分为组织性和社区性暴发。还有两个 GL 引入了第三种高流行状态。各国的定义、阈值和对策各不相同。

结论

由于对其有效性存在不确定性,以及各国在医疗保健系统和公共卫生政策方法上存在差异,预计组织性和社区性暴发的定义和对策会有所不同。然而,术语、定义和对策的变化令人困惑,反映了需要进行国际标准化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验