Environmental and Conservation Sciences Program, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA.
Research Center for Environmental Assessment and Technology for Hazardous Waste Management, Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand.
Chemosphere. 2019 Jun;225:226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
A novel entrapped cells-based-anaerobic forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (E-FOMBR) was developed. Its performance and fouling were investigated in comparison with suspended cells-based-anaerobic forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (S-FOMBR). E-FOMBR and S-FOMBR were operated under the same conditions with two widely used draw solutions (NaCl and (NH)SO). The membrane fouling especially irreversible fouling in S-FOMBR was more severe than that in E-FOMBR regardless of the type of draw solution. The permeate flux of E-FOMBR were 1.79 and 1.85 LMH while those of S-FOMBR were 1.49 and 1.14 LMH with NaCl and (NH)SO as draw solutions, respectively. More deterioration of biological activity (suggested by lower organic removal) due to accumulation of salt was observed in S-FOMBR compared to E-FOMBR. Proteobacteria dominated in both FOMBRs but was more abundant in E-FOMBR than S-FOMBR. The superiority of E-FOMBR over S-FOMBR included higher and stable system performance, higher flux, and longer operation time.
开发了一种新型包埋细胞厌氧正向渗透膜生物反应器(E-FOMBR)。将其与悬浮细胞厌氧正向渗透膜生物反应器(S-FOMBR)进行了性能和污染比较。E-FOMBR 和 S-FOMBR 在相同条件下使用两种广泛使用的汲取液(NaCl 和 (NH)SO)进行操作。无论汲取液类型如何,S-FOMBR 中的膜污染尤其是不可逆污染都比 E-FOMBR 更严重。E-FOMBR 的渗透通量分别为 1.79 和 1.85 LMH,而 S-FOMBR 的渗透通量分别为 1.49 和 1.14 LMH,分别使用 NaCl 和 (NH)SO 作为汲取液。与 E-FOMBR 相比,S-FOMBR 中由于盐的积累导致生物活性(通过较低的有机物去除率来表示)下降更明显。两种 FOMBR 中均以变形菌门为主,但 E-FOMBR 中的丰度高于 S-FOMBR。E-FOMBR 优于 S-FOMBR 的优势包括更高且稳定的系统性能、更高的通量和更长的运行时间。