Haines Michael R
Department of Economics, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY 13346, United States.
Econ Hum Biol. 2019 Aug;34:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
This paper uses the large cross sectional survey of 8544 workers in nine industries (pig iron, bar iron, steel, coal, coke, cottons, woolens, and glass) in the United States and five European countries (Belgium, Great Britain, France, Belgium, and Switzerland) to examine inequality in the industrial working class in the late nineteenth century. The paper looks at incomes, the food budget share (estimated using the Almost Ideal Demand System), and home ownership. The results show regular gradients with the unskilled workers doing less well than semi-skilled and skilled workers. Despite the lack of proprietors, farmers, and other groups with significant income from property, such surveys can be useful in the study of the historical aspects of inequality.
本文利用对美国九个行业(生铁、棒铁、钢铁、煤炭、焦炭、棉花、羊毛和玻璃)以及五个欧洲国家(比利时、英国、法国、比利时和瑞士)的8544名工人进行的大规模横断面调查,来研究19世纪后期工业工人阶级中的不平等现象。该论文考察了收入、食品预算份额(使用几乎理想需求系统估算)和住房所有权。结果显示出规律的梯度变化,非技术工人的情况不如半技术和技术工人。尽管缺乏业主、农民和其他有大量财产收入的群体,但此类调查在不平等的历史方面研究中可能会很有用。