Faculty of Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
NIVEL, Netherlands institute for health services research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e023576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576.
Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear.
All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated.
Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%).
The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.
纪律处分程序可能对医生的健康、个人生活和职业功能产生严重后果。直到最近,荷兰才公开披露具体的纪律处分措施(谴责)。公开披露谴责对医生的职业和个人生活的额外影响尚不清楚。
所有在 2012 年 7 月至 2016 年 8 月期间收到荷兰纪律委员会纪律处分的医生均被邀请参与一份 60 项问卷,内容涉及被调查者的特征、投诉、对程序的体验以及医生本人报告的程序对健康和职业功能的感知影响。回应率为 43%(n=210)。21.4%的人收到了谴责(公开);其余的人收到了警告(未公开)。计算两组之间的差异。
收到谴责的受访者报告的负面经历和对健康与工作的影响明显多于收到警告的受访者。37.8%的医生表示他们的健康状况非常好。一小部分人报告了中度至重度抑郁症状(3.6%)、中度至重度焦虑症(2%)或有倦怠迹象(10.8%)。大多数人报告说他们的专业实践发生了变化,与“防御性医疗”有关,例如进行更多的补充研究(41%)和更多地满足患者的愿望(35%)。
荷兰纪律处分程序具有强烈的负面影响,披露措施似乎会加剧负面影响。荷兰纪律法旨在促进专业实践的质量。安全的环境是质量改进的基本条件,因此,应仔细考虑披露纪律处分措施。披露纪律处分措施一直存在争议,本研究的结果重新引发了这一辩论。最近,荷兰众议院的多数人投票反对披露谴责,将披露谴责留给纪律委员会在认为适当或必要时自行决定。