Suppr超能文献

荷兰的医生如何看待纪律处分程序和纪律处分措施的披露对其专业实践、健康和职业机会的影响?对收到纪律处分的医生进行的问卷调查。

How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure.

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

NIVEL, Netherlands institute for health services research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e023576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear.

METHODS

All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated.

RESULTS

Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%).

CONCLUSION

The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.

摘要

简介

纪律处分程序可能对医生的健康、个人生活和职业功能产生严重后果。直到最近,荷兰才公开披露具体的纪律处分措施(谴责)。公开披露谴责对医生的职业和个人生活的额外影响尚不清楚。

方法

所有在 2012 年 7 月至 2016 年 8 月期间收到荷兰纪律委员会纪律处分的医生均被邀请参与一份 60 项问卷,内容涉及被调查者的特征、投诉、对程序的体验以及医生本人报告的程序对健康和职业功能的感知影响。回应率为 43%(n=210)。21.4%的人收到了谴责(公开);其余的人收到了警告(未公开)。计算两组之间的差异。

结果

收到谴责的受访者报告的负面经历和对健康与工作的影响明显多于收到警告的受访者。37.8%的医生表示他们的健康状况非常好。一小部分人报告了中度至重度抑郁症状(3.6%)、中度至重度焦虑症(2%)或有倦怠迹象(10.8%)。大多数人报告说他们的专业实践发生了变化,与“防御性医疗”有关,例如进行更多的补充研究(41%)和更多地满足患者的愿望(35%)。

结论

荷兰纪律处分程序具有强烈的负面影响,披露措施似乎会加剧负面影响。荷兰纪律法旨在促进专业实践的质量。安全的环境是质量改进的基本条件,因此,应仔细考虑披露纪律处分措施。披露纪律处分措施一直存在争议,本研究的结果重新引发了这一辩论。最近,荷兰众议院的多数人投票反对披露谴责,将披露谴责留给纪律委员会在认为适当或必要时自行决定。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Handling Complaints Related to Diagnostic Faults Before Disciplinary Bodies: Analysis of French Ordinal Jurisprudence.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79564. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
5
Experiences of Physicians Investigated for Professionalism Concerns: a Narrative Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):283-300. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08550-4. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
6
Experiences and recommendations of veterinarians for the Dutch disciplinary system-a survey-based study.
Vet Rec Open. 2023 Jun 25;10(1):e67. doi: 10.1002/vro2.67. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):e057169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057169.

本文引用的文献

1
Suffering in Silence: Medical Error and its Impact on Health Care Providers.
J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;54(4):402-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.001. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
The Second Victim: a Review.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jun;213:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
Wisdom in Medicine: What Helps Physicians After a Medical Error?
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):233-41. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000886.
7
[The well-being of dentists following a complaint procedure].
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2015 Jan;122(1):41-8. doi: 10.5177/ntvt.205.01.14152.
10
Supporting second victims of patient safety events: shouldn't these communications be covered by legal privilege?
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):852-8, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12095.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验