• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器官与配子捐赠过程中家庭自主权的病例报告与文献综述:伦理与法律分析

Case Reports and Literature Review About Family Autonomy in the Process of Donation of Organs and Gametes: An Ethical and Legal Analysis.

作者信息

Sardinha L A C, Athayde M V O, Rodrigues S L L, Cunha M R P D, Dantas Filho V P, Zambelli H J L, Lima M L, Araujo S, Boin I F S F

机构信息

Organ Procurement Organization, Clinical Hospital, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Organ Procurement Organization, Clinical Hospital, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2019 Mar;51(2):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.12.004
PMID:30879598
Abstract

The recovery or collection of postmortem semen raises relevant ethical and social concerns. In this study we report 2 cases witnessed by the authors in an organ procurement organization in Brazil. The patients had a diagnosis of brain death, were organ donors, and had no consent for the use of postmortem sperm. In Brazil, the diagnosis of brain death has been clearly established since 1997, with the most recent update in 2017, but has not considered the possibility of the collection of sperm or eggs from the donor. A review of the world literature has been carried out, as well as current legislation in different countries, including Brazil, with special interest in the impact on the autonomy of the deceased (informed consent or not), the wife, the generation of the child and their rights, and the ethical role of the physician.

摘要

死后精液的恢复或采集引发了相关的伦理和社会问题。在本研究中,我们报告了作者在巴西一家器官采购组织目睹的2例病例。这些患者被诊断为脑死亡,是器官捐献者,且未同意使用死后精子。自1997年以来,巴西已明确确立脑死亡诊断,2017年有最新更新,但未考虑从捐献者采集精子或卵子的可能性。我们对世界文献以及包括巴西在内的不同国家的现行立法进行了综述,特别关注对死者自主权(无论是否有知情同意)、妻子、孩子的生育及其权利的影响,以及医生的伦理角色。

相似文献

1
Case Reports and Literature Review About Family Autonomy in the Process of Donation of Organs and Gametes: An Ethical and Legal Analysis.器官与配子捐赠过程中家庭自主权的病例报告与文献综述:伦理与法律分析
Transplant Proc. 2019 Mar;51(2):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
2
Organ donation by a prisoner: legal and ethical considerations.囚犯的器官捐赠:法律与伦理考量
J La State Med Soc. 2010 Jan-Feb;162(1):44-6.
3
Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation after euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands.比利时和荷兰安乐死之后器官捐赠的法律与伦理问题
J Med Ethics. 2016 Aug;42(8):486-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102898. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
4
Semen collection requirement from multiple-organs brain-dead donors: report of two cases and analysis of the available Brazilian legislation.多器官脑死亡供体的精液采集要求:两例报告及巴西现有立法分析
Transplant Proc. 2013 Apr;45(3):1043-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.089.
5
Informed consent in research to improve the number and quality of deceased donor organs.知情同意在提高已故供体器官数量和质量的研究中的应用。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):280-3. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb04.
6
Consent for organ donation--balancing conflicting ethical obligations.器官捐赠同意书——平衡相互冲突的伦理义务
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1209-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0708194.
7
Ethical and legal issues in the use of related donors for therapeutic insemination.使用亲属供体进行治疗性人工授精的伦理和法律问题。
Urol Clin North Am. 2002 Nov;29(4):855-61. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00089-7.
8
Historical development and current status of organ procurement from death-row prisoners in China.中国死囚器官获取的历史发展与现状
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 3;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0074-0.
9
[An ethical evaluation of presumed consent for organ donation in Switzerland].[瑞士器官捐赠推定同意的伦理评估]
Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Feb 19;16(682):370-373.
10
Premortem interventions in dying children to optimise organ donation: an ethical analysis.对濒死儿童进行临终前干预以优化器官捐献:一项伦理分析。
J Med Ethics. 2016 Jul;42(7):424-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103098. Epub 2016 Mar 30.