• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术与乳房切除术对比,保乳手术中 DCIS 升级为浸润性癌的预测因素。

Predictive factors of upstaging DCIS to invasive carcinoma in BCT vs mastectomy.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1025-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.069. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.069
PMID:30879795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Upstaging from DCIS to invasive ductal carcinoma varies widely from 0 to 59%. We aim to identify risk factors associated with upstaging in all DCIS patients and based on specific surgical intervention.

METHODS

Patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS undergoing BCT or mastectomy were reviewed. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors for upstaging.

RESULTS

In total, 623 patients had a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS. Upstaging occurred in 74 patients (12%) overall. There was no difference in upstaging rates between mastectomy and BCT (11% v 14% p = 0.27). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive in 4/212 patients (1%). Multivariable analysis revealed suspicion of microinvasion (OR 5.7 95%CI2.2-14.9), surgeon suspicion of invasive disease (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.4) and larger size/multicentric/extensive tumor (OR 1.9 95% CI 1.1-3.4) increase risk of upstaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Suspicion of microinvasion, surgeon suspicion, and tumor size can be used to help guide the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy. For patients without these high risk characteristics, it is hard to justify the use of concurrent SLN biopsy for patients who undergo BCT.

摘要

背景

从 DCIS 升级为浸润性导管癌的比例差异很大,从 0 到 59%不等。我们旨在确定与所有 DCIS 患者升级相关的风险因素,并根据特定的手术干预进行分类。

方法

回顾了术前诊断为 DCIS 并接受 BCT 或乳房切除术的患者。进行多变量分析以确定升级的风险因素。

结果

共有 623 例患者术前诊断为 DCIS。总体而言,74 例(12%)发生升级。乳房切除术和 BCT 之间的升级率没有差异(11%比 14%,p=0.27)。212 例患者中有 4 例(1%)前哨淋巴结活检阳性。多变量分析显示怀疑微浸润(OR 5.7,95%CI2.2-14.9)、外科医生怀疑浸润性疾病(OR 2.7,95%CI 1.2-6.4)和更大的肿瘤大小/多灶性/广泛肿瘤(OR 1.9,95%CI 1.1-3.4)增加升级风险。

结论

怀疑微浸润、外科医生怀疑和肿瘤大小可用于指导前哨淋巴结活检的使用。对于没有这些高危特征的患者,对于接受 BCT 的患者,很难证明同时进行 SLN 活检是合理的。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors of upstaging DCIS to invasive carcinoma in BCT vs mastectomy.保乳手术与乳房切除术对比,保乳手术中 DCIS 升级为浸润性癌的预测因素。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jun;217(6):1025-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.069. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
2
Predictors of treatment with mastectomy, use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and upstaging to invasive cancer in patients diagnosed with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy.在经粗针活检诊断为乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的患者中,乳房切除术治疗、前哨淋巴结活检的使用以及分期为浸润性癌的预测因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;21(1):66-73. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3239-4. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
3
Upstaging to invasive ductal carcinoma after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ: predictive factors and role of sentinel lymph node biopsy.乳房切除术治疗原位导管癌后升级为浸润性导管癌:预测因素和前哨淋巴结活检的作用。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Nov;25(6):663-670. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0871-7. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Radiological and pathological predictors of post-operative upstaging of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma and lymph-nodes metastasis; a potential algorithm for node surgical de-escalation.影像学和病理学预测因素可使乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)术后升级为浸润性导管癌和淋巴结转移;淋巴结手术降级的潜在算法。
Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;56:102128. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102128. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Multicentre study of the risk of invasive cancer and use of sentinel node biopsy in women with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.多中心研究术前诊断为导管原位癌的女性浸润性癌风险和前哨淋巴结活检的应用。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):96-102. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11377. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
Necessity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ patients: a retrospective analysis.前哨淋巴结活检在导管原位癌患者中的必要性:一项回顾性分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01170-x.
7
Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Never justified?乳腺导管原位癌前哨淋巴结活检:是否永远不合理?
Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):325-333. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12928. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
8
Does sentinel lymph node biopsy for screening high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast cause more harm than good?用于筛查乳腺高级别导管原位癌的前哨淋巴结活检弊大于利吗?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05690-7. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Axillary evaluation is not warranted in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by core needle biopsy.术前通过核心针活检诊断为导管原位癌的患者,不需要进行腋窝评估。
Cancer Med. 2019 Dec;8(18):7586-7593. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2623. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
10
Factors associated with upstaging from ductal carcinoma in situ following core needle biopsy to invasive cancer in subsequent surgical excision.与核心针活检后从导管原位癌升级为浸润性癌相关的因素,在随后的手术切除中。
Breast. 2012 Oct;21(5):641-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival Outcomes Based on Axillary Surgery in Ductal Carcinoma : A Nationwide Study From the Korean Breast Cancer Society.基于导管癌腋窝手术的生存结果:韩国乳腺癌协会的一项全国性研究
J Breast Cancer. 2024 Feb;27(1):1-13. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2023.0221.
2
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery versus Conservative Mastectomy in the Management of Large Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Surgical, Oncological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.保乳整形手术与保乳根治术治疗乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的疗效比较:手术、肿瘤学及患者报告结局
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;14(22):5624. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225624.
3
Is conservative management of ductal carcinoma in situ risky?
导管原位癌的保守治疗有风险吗?
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Apr 28;8(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00420-2.
4
Application of deep learning to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with ultrasound.深度学习在利用超声预测乳腺导管原位癌低估方面的应用。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(4):295. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3981.