Guadagni Veronica, Sarà Marco, Conson Massimiliano, Carolei Antonio, Sacco Simona, Vadini Silvia, Pistarini Caterina, Barbonetti Arcangelo, Iaria Giuseppe, Pistoia Francesca
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Behav Neurol. 2019 Feb 10;2019:1312934. doi: 10.1155/2019/1312934. eCollection 2019.
Empathy has been conceptualized as comprising a cognitive and an emotional component, the latter being further divided into direct and indirect aspects, which refer, respectively, to the explicit evaluation of the observer's feelings while attending someone in an emotional situation and to the physiological response of the observer. Empathy has been previously investigated in several neurological disorders.
This study is aimed at investigating empathy in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesize that, due to deafferentation following their injury, SCI patients will display difficulty in the processing of emotional stimuli and blunted empathic responses as compared to healthy controls.
20 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) (12 males and 8 females, mean age = 50.9, standard deviation (SD) = 16.1 years; mean education = 10.9, SD = 4.1 years) were included in the study and compared to 20 matched healthy subjects. Participants were investigated using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) (STAI-Y), the Beck Depression Scale, and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Moreover, participants were further evaluated by means of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), which explores both cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy, and through an experimental protocol based on the use of a modified version of the computerized Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET) to evaluate emotional (direct and indirect) empathy and the ability to judge the valence of complex emotional scenes.
As compared to healthy controls, SCI patients reported higher scores on the subscale of the IRI, while, on the modified MET, they were less accurate in identifying the valence of neutral scenes, notwithstanding their spared direct and indirect emotional empathy ability. Furthermore, we found a significant negative correlation between the time interval since injury and the direct emotional empathy scores on the positive images, as well as a negative correlation with the indirect emotional empathy scores on both positive and neutral images, indicating a blunting of the empathic responses as time elapses.
Results suggest that SCI patients, when analyzing the meaning of emotional stimuli, tend to rely on a cognitive empathy strategy rather than on emotion simulation.
共情被概念化为包括认知和情感成分,后者进一步分为直接和间接方面,分别指在情感情境中关注他人时对观察者感受的明确评估以及观察者的生理反应。共情此前已在多种神经疾病中得到研究。
本研究旨在调查脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的共情情况。我们假设,由于损伤后的传入神经阻滞,与健康对照组相比,SCI患者在处理情感刺激时会表现出困难,且共情反应减弱。
20例脊髓损伤(SCI)患者(12例男性,8例女性,平均年龄 = 50.9岁,标准差(SD)= 16.1岁;平均受教育年限 = 10.9年,SD = 4.1年)被纳入研究,并与20例匹配的健康受试者进行比较。参与者使用状态 - 特质焦虑量表(Y型)(STAI - Y)、贝克抑郁量表和多伦多述情障碍量表进行调查。此外,通过人际反应指数(IRI)进一步评估参与者,该指数探索共情的认知和情感方面,并通过基于使用计算机化多维度共情测试(MET)修改版的实验方案来评估情感(直接和间接)共情以及判断复杂情感场景效价的能力。
与健康对照组相比,SCI患者在IRI子量表上得分更高,而在修改后的MET上,尽管他们的直接和间接情感共情能力未受影响,但在识别中性场景的效价方面准确性较低。此外,我们发现受伤后的时间间隔与积极图像上的直接情感共情得分之间存在显著负相关,并且与积极和中性图像上的间接情感共情得分均呈负相关,表明随着时间推移共情反应减弱。
结果表明,SCI患者在分析情感刺激的意义时,倾向于依赖认知共情策略而非情感模拟。