Boczar Kevin E, Alqarawi Wael, Green Martin S, Redpath Calum, Burwash Ian G, Dwivedi Girish
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research and Fiona Stanley Hospital, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Echocardiography. 2019 Apr;36(4):666-670. doi: 10.1111/echo.14308. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
There are discrepancies in the quantitative echocardiographic criteria for the right ventricle (RV) between the revised task force criteria (TFC) for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia (ARVC/D) and the guidelines for RV assessment endorsed by American Society of Echocardiography (ASE). Importantly, these criteria do not take into account potential adaptation of the RV to exercise. The goal of this study was to compare the revised TFC quantitative echocardiographic parameters in patients with ARVC/D, athletes and matched controls.
Echocardiographic parameters of the RV were retrospectively collected in patients who fulfilled the TFC for ARVC/D, an age- matched, sex-matched, and body surface area-matched control population, and athletes (defined as individuals who exercised for more than 7 hours per week). Patients with structural heart disease were excluded in the control and athlete groups.
Twenty patients with ARVC/D, 11 athletes and 20 matched controls were included. There was no significant difference between ARVC/D patients and athletes with the exception of the parasternal long axis right ventricular outflow tract diameter. All parameters were significantly different between ARVC/D patients and the control group. Furthermore, when subjects were categorized into meeting 1 major revised TFC/abnormal ASE criteria or not, only ASE criteria were able to differentiate ARVC/D from control population. Both were unable to differentiate ARVC/D from athletes.
Right ventricle quantitative echocardiographic criteria in the revised TFC are not specific for ARVC/D. Care should be taken in applying these criteria in athletes.
致心律失常性右室心肌病/发育不良(ARVC/D)的修订工作组标准(TFC)与美国超声心动图学会(ASE)认可的右室评估指南之间,在右心室(RV)定量超声心动图标准方面存在差异。重要的是,这些标准未考虑右室对运动的潜在适应性。本研究的目的是比较ARVC/D患者、运动员和匹配对照组的修订TFC定量超声心动图参数。
回顾性收集符合ARVC/D的TFC的患者、年龄匹配、性别匹配和体表面积匹配的对照人群以及运动员(定义为每周锻炼超过7小时的个体)的RV超声心动图参数。对照组和运动员组排除有结构性心脏病的患者。
纳入20例ARVC/D患者、11名运动员和20名匹配对照。除胸骨旁长轴右室流出道直径外,ARVC/D患者与运动员之间无显著差异。ARVC/D患者与对照组之间所有参数均有显著差异。此外,当将受试者分为符合1项主要修订TFC/异常ASE标准与否时,只有ASE标准能够区分ARVC/D与对照人群。两者均无法区分ARVC/D与运动员。
修订TFC中的右心室定量超声心动图标准对ARVC/D不具有特异性。在运动员中应用这些标准时应谨慎。