• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Institutional Costs and Physician Burden.

作者信息

Wadhera Rishi K, O'Brien Colin W, Joynt Maddox Karen E, Ho Kalon K L, Pinto Duane S, Resnic Frederic S, Shah Pinak B, Yeh Robert W

机构信息

Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2604-2608. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.014
PMID:30885686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6592265/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Institutional Costs and Physician Burden.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的公开报告：机构成本与医生负担
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2604-2608. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
2
A Survey of Interventional Cardiologists' Attitudes and Beliefs About Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）公众报告的介入心脏病学家态度和信念的调查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):629-634. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1095.
3
Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Moving Beyond the Status Quo.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的公众报告：超越现状。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):635-640. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0947.
4
Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的协作质量改进与公开报告：纽约州与密歇根州经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较
Am Heart J. 2015 Dec;170(6):1227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Effect of volume of percutaneous coronary intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarctions in hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup.在有和没有现场心脏手术支持的医院中，经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术量对急性心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Feb 20;163(2):216-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.093. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
6
Association between intraprocedural thrombotic events and adverse outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (a Harmonizing Outcomes With RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] Substudy).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者术中血栓事件与不良转归的相关性（急性心肌梗死血管重建和支架置入与结果协调研究[HORIZONS-AMI]亚研究）。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;113(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.034. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
7
Impact of pre-procedural cardiopulmonary instability in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial).急性心肌梗死后行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者术前心肺不稳定的影响（来自 Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial 试验）。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 1;114(7):962-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
8
High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Public Reporting States: the Evidence, Exclusion of Critically Ill Patients, and Implications.公共报告州的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：证据、重症患者排除及影响
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Dec;14(6):514-518. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0369-1.
9
Gaps in referral to cardiac rehabilitation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者转诊至心脏康复治疗的缺口。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):2079-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.063.
10
Multivessel vs culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention among patients 65 years or older with acute myocardial infarction.65岁及以上急性心肌梗死患者多支血管与仅罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较
Am Heart J. 2016 Feb;172:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Major Adverse Events on Procedural Selection for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program.主要不良事件对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗程序选择的影响：来自退伍军人事务部临床评估报告与跟踪项目的见解
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Oct 21;1(6):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100460. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
2
A decade of commitment to hospital quality of care: overview of and perceptions on multicomponent quality improvement policies involving accreditation, public reporting, inspection and pay-for-performance.十年医院质量关怀承诺：多方面质量改进政策的概述和看法，包括认证、公开报告、检查和按绩效付费。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07007-w.
3
Public reporting of PCI operator outcomes.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）操作人员治疗结果的公开报告。
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Dec 17;11(24):11797-11798. doi: 10.18632/aging.102624.
4
Association Between Current and Future Annual Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mortality Rates.当前和未来年度医院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;4(11):1077-1083. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3221.

本文引用的文献

1
A Survey of Interventional Cardiologists' Attitudes and Beliefs About Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）公众报告的介入心脏病学家态度和信念的调查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):629-634. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1095.
2
Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Moving Beyond the Status Quo.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的公众报告：超越现状。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):635-640. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0947.
3
High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Public Reporting States: the Evidence, Exclusion of Critically Ill Patients, and Implications.公共报告州的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：证据、重症患者排除及影响
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Dec;14(6):514-518. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0369-1.
4
Taking the "Public" Out of Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.将经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的公开报告中的“公开”部分去除。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1439-1440. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12087.
5
Patient and Physician Perspectives on Public Reporting of Mortality Ratings for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in New York State.患者与医生对纽约州经皮冠状动脉介入治疗死亡率评级公开报告的看法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Sep;10(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003511.
6
US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures.美国医生诊所每年花费超过154亿美元用于报告质量指标。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):401-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1258.
7
Association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者的手术管理结局公开报告与死亡率之间的关联。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 24;65(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.008.
8
Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的公共报告与医疗保险受益人的急性心肌梗死患者的利用和结局的关联。
JAMA. 2012 Oct 10;308(14):1460-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12922.
9
Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的公共报告与病例选择：来自两个大型多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗数据库的分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 7;45(11):1759-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.055.