CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit (Trauma - Emergency - Critical Care Medicine), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e522-e529. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003728.
Biomarkers have been suggested as potential prognostic predictors following a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury but their prognostic accuracy is still uncertain. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the ability of the glial fibrillary acidic protein to predict prognosis in patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.
MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and BIOSIS electronic databases and conference abstracts, bibliographies of selected studies, and narrative reviews were searched.
Pairs of reviewers identified eligible studies. Cohort studies including greater than or equal to four patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury and reporting glial fibrillary acidic protein levels according to the outcomes of interest, namely Glasgow Outcome Scale or Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, and mortality, were eligible.
Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data from the selected studies using a standardized case report form. Mean levels were log-transformed, and their differences were pooled with random effect models. Results are presented as geometric mean ratios. Methodologic quality, risk of bias, and applicability concerns of the included studies were assessed.
Seven-thousand seven-hundred sixty-five citations were retrieved of which 15 studies were included in the systematic review (n = 1,070), and nine were included in the meta-analysis (n = 701). We found significant associations between glial fibrillary acidic protein serum levels and Glasgow Outcome Scale score less than or equal to 3 or Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score less than or equal to 4 (six studies: geometric mean ratio 4.98 [95% CI, 2.19-11.13]; I = 94%) and between mortality (seven studies: geometric mean ratio 8.13 [95% CI, 3.89-17.00]; I = 99%).
Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein levels were significantly higher in patients with an unfavorable prognosis. Glial fibrillary acidic protein has a potential for clinical bedside use in helping for prognostic assessment. Further research should focus on multimodal approaches including tissue biomarkers for prognostic evaluation in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury.
生物标志物已被提议作为中度或重度创伤性脑损伤后的潜在预后预测指标,但它们的预后准确性仍不确定。本系统评价的目的是评估胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)预测中重度创伤性脑损伤患者预后的能力。
MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL 和 BIOSIS 电子数据库以及会议摘要、选定研究的参考文献和叙述性综述进行了检索。
配对的审查员确定了合格的研究。包括大于或等于 4 名中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的队列研究,并根据感兴趣的结果(即格拉斯哥结局量表或扩展格拉斯哥结局量表)和死亡率报告 GFAP 水平,符合条件。
配对的审查员使用标准化病例报告表独立地从选定的研究中提取数据。平均水平进行对数转换,并使用随机效应模型对其差异进行汇总。结果以几何均数比表示。评估了纳入研究的方法学质量、偏倚风险和适用性问题。
共检索到 7765 条引文,其中 15 项研究被纳入系统评价(n=1070),9 项研究被纳入荟萃分析(n=701)。我们发现 GFAP 血清水平与格拉斯哥结局量表评分≤3 或扩展格拉斯哥结局量表评分≤4(6 项研究:几何均数比 4.98[95%CI,2.19-11.13];I=94%)和死亡率(7 项研究:几何均数比 8.13[95%CI,3.89-17.00];I=99%)之间存在显著关联。
预后不良患者的血清 GFAP 水平明显升高。GFAP 具有在床边用于帮助预后评估的潜力。进一步的研究应侧重于包括组织生物标志物在内的多模态方法,用于评估创伤性脑损伤重症患者的预后。