• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胶质纤维酸性蛋白在创伤性脑损伤中的诊断和预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The diagnostic and prognostic value of glial fibrillary acidic protein in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, No.98 Nantong Westroad, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1235-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01979-y. Epub 2022 May 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-022-01979-y
PMID:35525877
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Over the years, blood biomarkers have been extensively applied for diagnostic and prognostic assessment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for TBI patients.

METHODS

The online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WFSD, were systematically retrieved from inception until May 2021. The RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15 were used to conduct data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 eligible studies comprising 3709 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that serum GFAP had a diagnostic value in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions (AUC 0.81; 95% CI 0.77-0.84; p < 0.00001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI 0.81-0.98), and 0.66 (95% 0.53-0.77; p < 0.00001), respectively. For assessment of unfavorable outcome, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC value were 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.76; p < 0.00001), 0.82(95% CI 0.72-0.90; p < 0.00001), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.88; p < 0.00001), respectively. Besides, GFAP exhibited a significant value in predicting mortality (AUC 0.81; 95% CI 0.77-0.84; p < 0.00001), with high sensitivity and specificity (0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, p < 0.00001, and 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.77, p < 0.00001). The subgroup analysis indicated that the type of TBI and cut-off value were potential sources of heterogeneity, which influenced the pooled AUC values for mortality prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that GFAP had diagnostic and prognostic value for TBI patients, especially during the early TBI.

摘要

目的

多年来,血液生物标志物已被广泛应用于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的诊断和预后评估。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)对 TBI 患者的诊断和预后价值。

方法

系统检索了包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、CNKI 和 WFSD 在内的在线数据库,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 5 月。使用 RevMan 5.3 软件和 Stata 15 进行数据分析。

结果

共有 22 项符合纳入标准的研究,包含 3709 例患者纳入了本荟萃分析。汇总结果表明,血清 GFAP 对检测创伤性颅内病变具有诊断价值(AUC 0.81;95%CI 0.77-0.84;p<0.00001)。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.93(95%CI 0.81-0.98)和 0.66(95%CI 0.53-0.77;p<0.00001)。对于不良预后的评估,汇总的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 0.66(95%CI 0.54-0.76;p<0.00001)、0.82(95%CI 0.72-0.90;p<0.00001)和 0.82(95%CI 0.76-0.88;p<0.00001)。此外,GFAP 在预测死亡率方面也具有显著意义(AUC 0.81;95%CI 0.77-0.84;p<0.00001),具有较高的敏感性和特异性(0.86,95%CI 0.79-0.92,p<0.00001,和 0.66,95%CI 0.52-0.77,p<0.00001)。亚组分析表明,TBI 类型和截断值是异质性的潜在来源,影响了死亡率预测的汇总 AUC 值。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,GFAP 对 TBI 患者具有诊断和预后价值,尤其是在早期 TBI 中。

相似文献

1
The diagnostic and prognostic value of glial fibrillary acidic protein in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胶质纤维酸性蛋白在创伤性脑损伤中的诊断和预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1235-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01979-y. Epub 2022 May 7.
2
The diagnosis and prognostic value of plasma copeptin in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血浆 copeptin 在创伤性脑损伤中的诊断及预后价值:一项系统评价与 Meta 分析
Neurol Sci. 2021 Feb;42(2):539-551. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-05019-8. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
3
Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Detecting Intracranial Injuries Following Minor Head Trauma; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血清胶质纤维酸性蛋白在检测轻度头部创伤后颅内损伤中的应用;一项系统评价与Meta分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 1;11(1):e9. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1682. eCollection 2023.
4
Prognostic Value of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Patients With Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胶质纤维酸性蛋白对中重度颅脑损伤患者预后的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e522-e529. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003728.
5
The Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 During the First Week After a Traumatic Brain Injury: Correlations With Clinical and Imaging Findings.创伤性脑损伤后第一周内胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素 C 末端水解酶-L1 的水平:与临床和影像学结果的相关性
Neurosurgery. 2016 Sep;79(3):456-64. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001226.
6
Performance of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Detecting Traumatic Intracranial Lesions on Computed Tomography in Children and Youth With Mild Head Trauma.胶质纤维酸性蛋白在检测轻度头部外伤儿童和青少年计算机断层扫描颅内创伤性病变中的表现
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;22(11):1274-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12795. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
7
Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein.创伤性脑损伤的急性生物标志物:泛素 C 端水解酶-L1 与神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白的血浆水平之间的关系。
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jan 1;31(1):19-25. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3040. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
8
S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.S100B、GFAP、UCH-L1 和 NSE 作为轻度创伤性脑损伤后 CT 成像异常的预测因子:诊断测试准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1171-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01678-z. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
Serum biomarkers as predictors of long-term outcome in severe traumatic brain injury: analysis from a randomized placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial.血清生物标志物可预测严重创伤性脑损伤的长期预后:一项随机安慰剂对照 II 期临床试验分析。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;125(3):631-41. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15674. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
10
Association of Very Early Serum Levels of S100B, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1, and Spectrin Breakdown Product with Outcome in ProTECT III.S100B、胶质纤维酸性蛋白、泛素羧基末端水解酶-L1 和血影蛋白断裂产物的非常早期血清水平与 PROTECT III 结局的关系。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Oct 15;36(20):2863-2871. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5809. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic and peripheral biomarkers of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍与创伤性脑损伤共病的遗传和外周生物标志物:一项系统综述。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 27;16:1500667. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1500667. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of Neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in MS and AQP4-NMOSD: Advancing clinical applications.神经丝轻链(NfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)在多发性硬化症(MS)和水通道蛋白4相关性视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病(AQP4-NMOSD)中的作用:推进临床应用
eNeurologicalSci. 2025 Jan 6;38:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2025.100550. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Low Albumin Levels Are Associated with Poorer Outcomes in a Case Series of COVID-19 Patients in Spain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.西班牙COVID-19患者病例系列中低白蛋白水平与较差预后相关:一项回顾性队列研究
Microorganisms. 2020 Jul 24;8(8):1106. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8081106.
2
Role of glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker in differentiating intracerebral haemorrhage from ischaemic stroke and stroke mimics: a meta-analysis.胶质纤维酸性蛋白作为区分脑出血与缺血性卒中和卒中类似物的生物标志物的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Biomarkers. 2020 Feb;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2019.1691657. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
Prognostic Value of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Patients With Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Circulating Brain-Reactive Autoantibody Profiles in Military Breachers Exposed to Repetitive Occupational Blast.
暴露于重复性职业爆炸的军事爆破人员的循环脑反应性自身抗体谱。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 21;25(24):13683. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413683.
4
Tau, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, and Neurofilament Light Chain as Brain Protein Biomarkers in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood for Diagnosis of Neurobiological Diseases.tau、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白和神经丝轻链作为脑蛋白生物标志物在脑脊液和血液中的神经生物学疾病诊断。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 7;25(12):6295. doi: 10.3390/ijms25126295.
5
Identification of novel blood-based extracellular vesicles biomarker candidates with potential specificity for traumatic brain injury in polytrauma patients.鉴定新型创伤性脑损伤血液外泌体生物标志物候选物,具有多发伤患者的潜在特异性。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 12;15:1347767. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1347767. eCollection 2024.
6
Fluid-Based Protein Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: The View from the Bedside.基于液体的创伤性脑损伤蛋白生物标志物:来自床边的观察。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 13;24(22):16267. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216267.
7
Enhancing hospital course and outcome prediction in patients with traumatic brain injury: A machine learning study.提高创伤性脑损伤患者的住院过程和预后预测:一项机器学习研究。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Feb;37(1):74-83. doi: 10.1177/19714009231212364. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
8
Traumatic brain injury: the research continues with higher data quality evolving!创伤性脑损伤:随着数据质量不断提高,研究仍在继续!
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1169-1170. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02255-3. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood Biomarkers in Patients with Post-Traumatic Disorders of Consciousness: A Scoping Review.创伤后意识障碍患者的脑脊液和血液生物标志物:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 20;13(2):364. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020364.
胶质纤维酸性蛋白对中重度颅脑损伤患者预后的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e522-e529. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003728.
4
Correlation of Blood Biomarkers and Biomarker Panels with Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤后 CT 检查的创伤发现与血液生物标志物及标志物组合的相关性。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jul 15;36(14):2178-2189. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6254. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
5
Glial fibrillary acidic protein for the early diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.胶质纤维酸性蛋白在脑出血早期诊断中的应用:系统评价和诊断试验准确性的荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jun;14(4):390-399. doi: 10.1177/1747493018806167. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Glial fibrillary acidic protein elevations relate to neuroimaging abnormalities after mild TBI.胶质纤维酸性蛋白升高与轻度创伤性脑损伤后的神经影像学异常有关。
Neurology. 2018 Oct 9;91(15):e1385-e1389. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006321. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
Combining H-FABP and GFAP increases the capacity to differentiate between CT-positive and CT-negative patients with mild traumatic brain injury.联合检测 H-FABP 和 GFAP 可提高对 CT 阳性和 CT 阴性的轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的鉴别能力。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 9;13(7):e0200394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200394. eCollection 2018.
8
Age-Related Differences in Diagnostic Accuracy of Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Tau for Identifying Acute Intracranial Trauma on Computed Tomography: A TRACK-TBI Study.基于 TRACK-TBI 研究的脑创伤后认知障碍转化研究联盟:血浆神经丝轻链蛋白和 Tau 对识别急性颅脑创伤的诊断准确性的年龄差异:基于 TRACK-TBI 研究的脑创伤后认知障碍转化研究联盟。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Oct 15;35(20):2341-2350. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5694. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤的诊断和预后生物标志物的最新研究进展。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Feb;18(2):165-180. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1428089. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
10
Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013.2007年和2013年美国与创伤性脑损伤相关的急诊科就诊、住院及死亡情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.