Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Physics Department, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Jun;99:1341-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.136. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical-mechanical and morphological properties of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), for a new application as a prosthetic component for overdentures implant-retained, compared with different polymers. Were prepared 20 specimens for each material: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Polyacetal, Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Polyethylene, for analysis of roughness and hardness surface, compressive strength and pull out test. For fatigue strength test, a total of 200 capsules (n = 40) were captured in pairs with acrylic resin and subjected to 2900 insertion/removal cycles, simulating 24 months of overdenture use. In this test, a group was added (o-ring Intra-Lock System) as a standard of comparison. The morphological and structural analysis were realized by stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). All specimens in this study were analyzed before and after thermocycling (5-55 °C, for 10,000 cycles). Two-way ANOVA with repeated measurements and Tukey test were used (α = 0.05). For roughness, difference was observed only between the materials, with lowest averages for Polyacetal and PET (p < 0.001). For the hardness there was no statistically significant difference between the materials (p > 0.001). For compressive strength, Polyacetal, followed by PET (p < 0.001) presented the highest values independent of thermocycling. In the pullout test, PET and polyacetal presented, the highest values (p = 0.033). In the fatigue test, for 24 months analysis, difference was observed before and after thermocycling for O-ring group (p = 0.010) and polyacetal (p = 0.002), PET also presented higher values of resistance in relation to the o-ring (p < 0.001). The thermocycling did not alter the polyethylene surface through SEM images as well as the structure of all the materials analyzed by FTIR and DRX. In this study, the PET presented results compatible with those expected, which suggests its application for making retention capsules for implant-retained overdentures.
本研究旨在评估聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)的物理力学和形态特性,因为它有作为用于种植体支持覆盖义齿固位体的新应用,与不同的聚合物进行比较。为了分析表面粗糙度和硬度、压缩强度和拔出试验,为每种材料制备了 20 个样本:聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)、聚甲醛、聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)和聚乙烯。对于疲劳强度试验,总共将 200 个胶囊(n=40)成对捕获并用丙烯酸树脂固定,并进行 2900 次插入/取出循环,模拟覆盖义齿使用 24 个月。在此测试中,添加了一组(o 形环 Intra-Lock System)作为比较标准。通过体视显微镜、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱和 X 射线衍射(XRD)进行形态和结构分析。本研究中的所有样本均在热循环(5-55°C,10000 次循环)前后进行分析。使用双向重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)。对于粗糙度,仅观察到材料之间存在差异,聚甲醛和 PET 的平均值最低(p<0.001)。对于硬度,材料之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.001)。对于压缩强度,聚甲醛和 PET(p<0.001)在热循环前后均表现出最高值,独立于热循环。在拔出试验中,PET 和聚甲醛表现出最高值(p=0.033)。在疲劳试验中,对于 24 个月的分析,o 形环组和聚甲醛组在热循环前后存在差异(p=0.010 和 p=0.002),PET 与 o 形环相比也表现出更高的阻力值(p<0.001)。热循环通过 SEM 图像没有改变聚乙烯表面,以及通过 FTIR 和 DRX 分析的所有材料的结构。在这项研究中,PET 表现出与预期结果相匹配的结果,这表明它可用于制造种植体支持覆盖义齿固位体的保持胶囊。