Suppr超能文献

不同探头类型的超声引导经口气管插管的准确性。

Accuracy of ultrasound for endotracheal intubation between different transducer types.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2182-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound has been increasingly utilized for the identification of endotracheal tube (ETT) location after an intubation attempt, particularly among patients in cardiac arrest. However, prior studies have varied with respect to the choice of transducer and no studies have directly compared the accuracy between transducer types. Our study is the first to directly compare the accuracy of ETT confirmation between the linear and curvilinear transducer.

METHODS

This study was performed in a cadaver lab using three different cadavers chosen to represent varying neck circumferences. Cadavers were randomized to tracheal or esophageal intubation. Blinded sonographers assessed the location of the ETT using either a linear or curvilinear transducer in an alternating sequence. Accuracy of sonographer identification, time to identification, and operator confidence were assessed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and five assessments were performed with 198 (48.9%) tracheal and 207 (51.1%) esophageal intubations. The linear transducer was 98% (95% CI 95.1% to 99.2%) accurate. The curvilinear transducer was 95% (95% CI 91.1% to 97.3%) accurate. The mean time to identification was significantly lower with the linear transducer [7.46 s (95% CI 6.23 to 8.7 s)] as compared with the curvilinear transducer [11.63 s (95% CI 9.05 to 14.2 s)]. The mean operator confidence was significantly higher with the linear transducer [4.84/5.0 (95% CI 4.76 to 4.91)] than with the curvilinear transducer [4.44/5.0 (95% CI 4.3 to 4.57)]. All operators preferred the linear transducer over the curvilinear transducer.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for ETT confirmation did not significantly differ between ultrasound transducer types, but the curvilinear transducer was associated with a longer time to confirmation and lower operator confidence. Further studies are needed to determine if the accuracy would change with more novice providers or in specific patient populations.

摘要

简介

在尝试插管后,超声已越来越多地用于确定气管内导管(ETT)的位置,尤其是在心脏骤停患者中。然而,先前的研究在换能器的选择上存在差异,并且没有研究直接比较两种换能器类型的准确性。我们的研究首次直接比较了线性和曲线换能器在确认 ETT 方面的准确性。

方法

本研究在尸体实验室中进行,使用了三个不同的尸体,以代表不同的颈部周长。尸体随机进行气管或食管插管。盲法超声医师使用线性或曲线换能器以交替的顺序评估 ETT 的位置。评估了超声医师识别的准确性、识别时间和操作人员的信心。

结果

共进行了 405 次评估,其中 198 次(48.9%)为气管插管,207 次(51.1%)为食管插管。线性换能器的准确率为 98%(95%CI 95.1%至 99.2%)。曲线换能器的准确率为 95%(95%CI 91.1%至 97.3%)。与曲线换能器[11.63 秒(95%CI 9.05 秒至 14.2 秒)]相比,线性换能器的识别时间明显更短[7.46 秒(95%CI 6.23 秒至 8.7 秒)]。线性换能器的平均操作人员信心明显高于曲线换能器[4.84/5.0(95%CI 4.76 秒至 4.91 秒)],[4.44/5.0(95%CI 4.3 秒至 4.57 秒)]。所有操作人员都更喜欢使用线性换能器而非曲线换能器。

结论

超声用于确认 ETT 的诊断准确性在换能器类型之间没有显著差异,但曲线换能器的确认时间更长,操作人员的信心更低。需要进一步的研究来确定准确性是否会随着更多经验不足的提供者或在特定患者群体中发生变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验