Cueli Marisol, Areces Débora, McCaskey Ursina, Álvarez-García David, González-Castro Paloma
Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Center for MR-Research, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 5;10:465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00465. eCollection 2019.
Magnitude comparison skills have been related to mathematics competence, although results in this area vary. The current study aimed to describe the performance of 75 children (aged 4-5 years) in two comparison tasks; and examine the strength of the relationship between each of the two tasks and mathematics competence level (MCL). Participants were assessed with the Early Numeracy Test which provides a global MCL score. Magnitude comparison skills were assessed with two tasks: a non-symbolic number comparison task and a spatial comparison task. Results of the Pearson correlation analysis showed a relationship between the two tasks with better performance in the spatial comparison task. Regression analysis with the stepwise method showed that only the non-symbolic number comparison task had a significant value in the prediction of the MCL pointing to the need to take these kinds of tasks into account in the first years of school.
数量比较技能与数学能力有关,尽管该领域的研究结果各不相同。本研究旨在描述75名4至5岁儿童在两项比较任务中的表现;并检验这两项任务与数学能力水平(MCL)之间关系的强度。通过早期算术测试对参与者进行评估,该测试提供一个整体的MCL分数。通过两项任务评估数量比较技能:一项非符号数字比较任务和一项空间比较任务。皮尔逊相关分析结果表明,两项任务之间存在关联,空间比较任务表现更好。逐步回归分析表明,只有非符号数字比较任务在预测MCL方面具有显著价值,这表明在入学的头几年需要考虑这类任务。