Escolano-Pérez Elena, Herrero-Nivela Maria Luisa, Losada José Luis
Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01044. eCollection 2020.
Motor development is an inseparable component of cognitive development. So, to develop the mind, it is necessary to work the body. Therefore, Early Childhood Education curricula and the scientific literature emphasize the need to promote the development of motor skills during the 1st years of life. These skills are necessary for learning and subsequent academic performance. However, studies frequently offer only a partial view of these relationships. Few works have analyzed the specific relationships between different components of preschool gross and fine motor skills and subsequent performance on different academic competencies. Further, they present discrepant results. The aim of this study was to determinate which specific components of gross and fine motor skills assessed in Spanish students during the final year of Early Childhood Education (5 to 6-year-olds) were associated with different academic competencies assessed in the following academic year, when the students were in their 1st year of Primary Education. The final sample consisted of 38 Spanish students, aged 5. A mixed methods approach was used. It consisted of systematic observation to assess specific components of gross and fine motor skills when children were in the Early Childhood Education period, and selective methodology to evaluate their academic competencies (specifically in literacy and mathematics and overall), 1 year later, once in Primary Education. Multiple linear regression models were constructed using the computing language R to examine the association between motor skills and academic competencies. The results indicated that only the components of fine motor skills showed associations with academic competencies. The pattern of association varied when literacy and mathematics competencies were specifically and individually assessed and when overall academic competency was considered. The two assessed fine motor skills (Coordination and Integration) were associated with literacy competency (β = 0.344, = 0.025; β = 0.349, = 0.024, respectively) and overall academic competency (β = 0.267, = 0.065; β = 0.493, = 0.001, respectively). However, only Integration was associated with mathematics competency (β = 0.476, = 0.002). The "Discussion" section focuses on the educational implications of these results and future research. It highlights the importance of early assessment of fine motor skills to identify students likely to present inadequate subsequent academic performance and the need to apply instruction and interventions tailored to the specific needs of each child.
运动发展是认知发展中不可分割的一部分。因此,要发展心智,就必须锻炼身体。所以,幼儿教育课程和科学文献强调在生命的最初几年促进运动技能发展的必要性。这些技能对于学习和后续的学业表现至关重要。然而,研究往往只提供了这些关系的部分观点。很少有研究分析学前儿童大肌肉和精细运动技能的不同组成部分与不同学业能力后续表现之间的具体关系。此外,它们呈现出相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是确定在幼儿教育最后一年(5至6岁)对西班牙学生评估的大肌肉和精细运动技能的哪些具体组成部分与下一学年学生进入小学一年级时评估的不同学业能力相关。最终样本包括38名5岁的西班牙学生。采用了混合方法。它包括在儿童处于幼儿教育阶段时进行系统观察,以评估大肌肉和精细运动技能的具体组成部分,以及在进入小学教育一年后采用选择性方法来评估他们的学业能力(特别是在读写和数学以及整体方面)。使用计算语言R构建多元线性回归模型,以检验运动技能与学业能力之间的关联。结果表明,只有精细运动技能的组成部分与学业能力相关。当分别具体评估读写和数学能力以及考虑整体学业能力时,关联模式有所不同。评估的两项精细运动技能(协调性和整合性)分别与读写能力(β = 0.344,p = 0.025;β = 0.349,p = 0.024)和整体学业能力(β = 0.267,p = 0.065;β = 0.493,p = 0.001)相关。然而,只有整合性与数学能力相关(β = 0.476,p = 0.002)。“讨论”部分重点阐述了这些结果的教育意义和未来研究方向。它强调了早期评估精细运动技能对于识别可能在后续学业表现不佳的学生的重要性,以及需要根据每个孩子的具体需求实施针对性的教学和干预措施。