Lee Dongsook, Na Sohyun, Park Surim, Go Sanghee, Ma Jinyoung, Yang Soonha, Kim Kichul, Lee Seunggwan, Hwang Doyeong
Research Center of Fertility and Genetics, Hamchoon Women's Clinic, 10, Seochojungang-ro 8-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
2Department of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Feb 26;12:10. doi: 10.1186/s13039-019-0422-8. eCollection 2019.
Conventional cytogenetic analysis using G-band karyotyping has been the method of choice for prenatal diagnosis, accurately detecting chromosomal abnormalities larger than 5 Mb. However, the method is inefficient for detecting the submicroscopic deletions and duplications that are associated with malformations and mental retardation. This study evaluated the results of the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) P245 assay used for prenatal diagnosis in cases with unusual ultrasonographic findings or specifically where parents wanted to be tested. The objective was to compare the results from MLPA with those from conventional cytogenetic testing in order to determine their concordance and the additional diagnostic yield of MLPA over G-band karyotyping.
Of the 7522 prenatal cases analyzed, 124 were found to have genomic imbalances (1.6%). Of those 124 cases, 41 had gene loss (33.6%), and 83 had gene gain (66.4%). Most of the cases with genomic imbalances (64.5%) showed no abnormal karyotype. In particular, all cases with a 4p16.3 deletion (Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome) showed an abnormal karyotype, whereas all of those with a 22q11-13 deletion showed a normal karyotype. In most of the cases with pathogenic deletions, the indication for invasive prenatal testing was an increase in the nuchal translucency (NT) alone (51.2%). Other indications observed in the remaining cases were abnormal serum screening markers (14.6%), other ultrasonographic findings (9.8%), pregnancy through in vitro fertilization and fertility assistance (9.8%), and advanced maternal age(2.4%).
These results show that for fetuses with an enlarged NT or abnormal ultrasonographic findings and normal conventional karyotype, additional genetic investigation like molecular testing would be for identifying the microscopic genomic aberrations (microdeletions, microduplications) responsible for syndromic associations including structural anomalies and mental retardation.
使用G带核型分析的传统细胞遗传学分析一直是产前诊断的首选方法,能够准确检测大于5 Mb的染色体异常。然而,该方法在检测与畸形和智力发育迟缓相关的亚微观缺失和重复方面效率较低。本研究评估了用于产前诊断的多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)P245检测在超声检查结果异常或父母特别要求检测的病例中的结果。目的是比较MLPA与传统细胞遗传学检测的结果,以确定它们的一致性以及MLPA相对于G带核型分析的额外诊断率。
在分析的7522例产前病例中,发现124例存在基因组失衡(1.6%)。在这124例病例中,41例存在基因缺失(33.6%),83例存在基因增加(66.4%)。大多数基因组失衡病例(64.5%)核型正常。特别是,所有4p16.3缺失(沃尔夫-赫希霍恩综合征)的病例核型均异常,而所有22q11-13缺失的病例核型均正常。在大多数致病性缺失病例中,侵入性产前检测的指征仅为颈项透明层(NT)增厚(51.2%)。其余病例中观察到的其他指征包括血清筛查标志物异常(14.6%)、其他超声检查结果(9.8%)、体外受精和辅助生殖妊娠(9.8%)以及母亲高龄(2.4%)。
这些结果表明,对于NT增厚或超声检查结果异常且传统核型正常的胎儿,进行额外的基因检测(如分子检测)有助于识别导致包括结构异常和智力发育迟缓等综合征关联的微观基因组畸变(微缺失、微重复)。