van Boheemen Lotte A, Hammers Martijn, Kingma Sjouke A, Richardson David S, Burke Terry, Komdeur Jan, Dugdale Hannah L
School of Biological Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.
Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 14;9(5):2986-2995. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4982. eCollection 2019 Mar.
In cooperatively breeding species, care provided by helpers may affect the dominant breeders' investment trade-offs between current and future reproduction. By negatively compensating for such additional care, breeders can reduce costs of reproduction and improve their own chances of survival. Alternatively, helper care can be additive to that of dominants, increasing the fledging fitness of the current brood. However, the influence helpers have on brood care may be affected by group size and territory quality. Therefore, the impact of helping needs to be disentangled from other factors determining offspring investment before conclusive inferences about the effect of help on additive and compensatory care can be made. We used 20 years of provisioning data to investigate the effect of helping on provisioning rates in the facultative cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler . Our extensive dataset allowed us to statistically disentangle the effects of helper presence, living in larger groups and different food availability. We show compensatory and additive care (i.e., partial compensation) in response to helper provisioning. Helpers lightened the provisioning load of the dominant male and female and increased total provisioning to nestlings. This was irrespective of group size or territory quality (food availability). Moreover, our results illustrate sex-specific variation in parental care over the course of the breeding event. We discriminate between temporal variation, group size, and territory quality processes affecting cooperative care and as such, gain further insight into the importance of these factors to the evolutionary maintenance of helping behavior.
在合作繁殖的物种中,辅助者提供的照料可能会影响优势繁殖者在当前繁殖和未来繁殖之间的投资权衡。通过对这种额外照料进行负面补偿,繁殖者可以降低繁殖成本并提高自身的生存几率。或者,辅助者的照料可以与优势繁殖者的照料相加,提高当前一窝雏鸟的出飞适合度。然而,辅助者对育雏照料的影响可能会受到群体规模和领地质量的影响。因此,在能够就辅助行为对相加性照料和补偿性照料的影响得出确凿推论之前,需要将辅助行为的影响与其他决定后代投资的因素区分开来。我们利用20年的食物供应数据,研究了辅助行为对兼性合作繁殖的塞舌尔莺食物供应率的影响。我们广泛的数据集使我们能够从统计学上区分辅助者的存在、生活在较大群体中以及不同食物可获得性的影响。我们发现,作为对辅助者提供食物的回应,存在补偿性照料和相加性照料(即部分补偿)。辅助者减轻了优势雄鸟和雌鸟的食物供应负担,并增加了对雏鸟的总食物供应量。这与群体规模或领地质量(食物可获得性)无关。此外,我们的结果说明了在繁殖过程中亲代照料存在性别特异性差异。我们区分了影响合作照料的时间变化、群体规模和领地质量过程,从而进一步深入了解这些因素对辅助行为进化维持的重要性。