• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病药物依从性与数字健康活动追踪之间的关联:回顾性分析

The Association Between Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions and Digital Health Activity Tracking: Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Quisel Tom, Foschini Luca, Zbikowski Susan M, Juusola Jessie L

机构信息

Evidation Health, San Mateo, CA, United States.

inZights Consulting, LLC, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 20;21(3):e11486. doi: 10.2196/11486.

DOI:10.2196/11486
PMID:30892271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6446150/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases have a widespread impact on health outcomes and costs in the United States. Heart disease and diabetes are among the biggest cost burdens on the health care system. Adherence to medication is associated with better health outcomes and lower total health care costs for individuals with these conditions, but the relationship between medication adherence and health activity behavior has not been explored extensively.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between medication adherence and health behaviors among a large population of insured individuals with hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of health status, behaviors, and medication adherence from medical and pharmacy claims and health behavior data. Adherence was measured in terms of proportion of days covered (PDC), calculated from pharmacy claims using both a fixed and variable denominator methodology. Individuals were considered adherent if their PDC was at least 0.80. We used step counts, sleep, weight, and food log data that were transmitted through devices that individuals linked. We computed metrics on the frequency of tracking and the extent to which individuals engaged in each tracking activity. Finally, we used logistic regression to model the relationship between adherent status and the activity-tracking metrics, including age and sex as fixed effects.

RESULTS

We identified 117,765 cases with diabetes, 317,340 with dyslipidemia, and 673,428 with hypertension between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2016 in available data sources. Average fixed and variable PDC for all individuals ranged from 0.673 to 0.917 for diabetes, 0.756 to 0.921 for dyslipidemia, and 0.756 to 0.929 for hypertension. A subgroup of 8553 cases also had health behavior data (eg, activity-tracker data). On the basis of these data, individuals who tracked steps, sleep, weight, or diet were significantly more likely to be adherent to medication than those who did not track any activities in both the fixed methodology (odds ratio, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.29-1.36) and variable methodology (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.32-1.43), with age and sex as fixed effects. Furthermore, there was a positive association between frequency of activity tracking and medication adherence. In the logistic regression model, increasing the adjusted tracking ratio by 0.5 increased the fixed adherent status OR by a factor of 1.11 (95% CI 1.06-1.16). Finally, we found a positive association between number of steps and adherent status when controlling for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Adopters of digital health activity trackers tend to be more adherent to hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia medications, and adherence increases with tracking frequency. This suggests that there may be value in examining new ways to further promote medication adherence through programs that incentivize health tracking and leveraging insights derived from connected devices to improve health outcomes.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3f/6446150/bc30484f328e/jmir_v21i3e11486_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3f/6446150/bc30484f328e/jmir_v21i3e11486_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3f/6446150/bc30484f328e/jmir_v21i3e11486_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

慢性病对美国的健康状况和成本有着广泛影响。心脏病和糖尿病是医疗保健系统最大的成本负担之一。坚持服药与这些疾病患者的更好健康状况和更低的总体医疗保健成本相关,但药物依从性与健康活动行为之间的关系尚未得到广泛探讨。

目的

本研究的目的是在大量患有高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常的参保人群中,研究药物依从性与健康行为之间的关系。

方法

我们对医疗和药房索赔以及健康行为数据中的健康状况、行为和药物依从性进行了回顾性分析。依从性通过覆盖天数比例(PDC)来衡量,使用固定分母和可变分母方法从药房索赔中计算得出。如果个体的PDC至少为0.80,则被视为依从。我们使用了通过个体连接的设备传输的步数、睡眠、体重和食物日志数据。我们计算了跟踪频率以及个体参与每项跟踪活动的程度的指标。最后,我们使用逻辑回归来建立依从状态与活动跟踪指标之间的关系模型,将年龄和性别作为固定效应。

结果

在2015年1月1日至2016年6月1日的可用数据源中,我们识别出117,765例糖尿病患者、317,340例血脂异常患者和673,428例高血压患者。所有个体的平均固定和可变PDC,糖尿病患者为0.673至0.917,血脂异常患者为0.756至0.921,高血压患者为0.756至0.929。一个8553例的亚组也有健康行为数据(如活动追踪器数据)。基于这些数据,在固定方法(优势比,OR 1.33,95%可信区间1.29 - 1.36)和可变方法(OR 1.37,95%可信区间1.32 - 1.43)中,跟踪步数、睡眠、体重或饮食的个体比未跟踪任何活动的个体更有可能坚持服药,将年龄和性别作为固定效应。此外,活动跟踪频率与药物依从性之间存在正相关。在逻辑回归模型中,将调整后的跟踪率提高0.5会使固定依从状态OR增加1.11倍(95%可信区间1.06 - 1.16)。最后,在控制年龄和性别时,我们发现步数与依从状态之间存在正相关。

结论

数字健康活动追踪器的使用者往往更能坚持服用高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常药物,且依从性随跟踪频率增加。这表明,通过激励健康跟踪的项目以及利用连接设备获得的见解来改善健康状况,研究进一步促进药物依从性的新方法可能具有价值。

相似文献

1
The Association Between Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions and Digital Health Activity Tracking: Retrospective Analysis.慢性病药物依从性与数字健康活动追踪之间的关联:回顾性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 20;21(3):e11486. doi: 10.2196/11486.
2
Impact of Telehealth Interventions on Medication Adherence for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, and/or Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review.远程医疗干预对 2 型糖尿病、高血压和/或血脂异常患者药物依从性的影响:系统评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 May;55(5):637-649. doi: 10.1177/1060028020950726. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Spending Among Privately Insured Adults With Chronic Conditions in the United States, 2010-2016.美国 2010-2016 年慢性疾病私人保险成年人的药物依从性、医疗保健利用率和支出。
Am J Med. 2020 Jun;133(6):690-704.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.每日服药频次对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者慢性药物治疗依从性的影响。
Adv Ther. 2012 Aug;29(8):675-90. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0040-x. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
5
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.加拿大数字健康自我追踪运动的传播:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 2;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.
6
Associations of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonist Medication Adherence and Economic Outcomes Among Commercially Insured US Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.商业保险覆盖的美国成年人中,肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂药物治疗依从性和经济结果的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e016094. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.016094. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
7
Effect of Reminder Devices on Medication Adherence: The REMIND Randomized Clinical Trial.提醒装置对药物依从性的影响:REMIND随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):624-631. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9627.
8
Effect of Combination Therapy on Adherence Among US Patients Initiating Therapy for Hypertension: a Cohort Study.联合治疗对美国高血压初始治疗患者依从性的影响:一项队列研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3972-z. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence.糖尿病远程监测项目对药物依从性的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jun;27(6):724-731. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.724.
10
Impact of adherence to antidepressants on healthcare outcomes and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes and comorbid major depressive disorder.2型糖尿病合并重度抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药的依从性对医疗结局和成本的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1879-1889. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1347092. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication Management Initiatives Using Wearable Devices: Scoping Review.使用可穿戴设备的药物管理计划:范围综述。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 27;11:e57652. doi: 10.2196/57652.
2
Forging a Career in Digital Health Research.投身数字健康研究领域的职业生涯。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Dec;167(7):1260-1263. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Patient Adherence to a Real-World Digital, Asynchronous Weight Loss Program in Australia That Combines Behavioural and GLP-1 RA Therapy: A Mixed Methods Study.澳大利亚一项结合行为疗法和GLP-1受体激动剂疗法的真实世界数字异步减肥计划的患者依从性:一项混合方法研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between adherence and outcomes among older, type 2 diabetes patients: evidence from a Medicare Supplemental database.老年2型糖尿病患者的依从性与治疗结果之间的关联:来自医疗保险补充数据库的证据。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 16;10:1573-81. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S107543. eCollection 2016.
2
A Pharmacist Telephone Intervention to Identify Adherence Barriers and Improve Adherence Among Nonadherent Patients with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes in a Medicare Advantage Plan.一项药师电话干预措施,旨在识别依从性障碍并提高医疗保险优势计划中患有高血压和糖尿病合并症的非依从患者的依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):63-73. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.63.
3
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;14(6):480. doi: 10.3390/bs14060480.
4
Ethical Concerns for Remote Computer Perception in Cardiology: New Stages for Digital Health Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning.心脏病学中远程计算机感知的伦理问题:数字健康技术、人工智能和机器学习的新阶段
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 May;17(5):e010717. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010717. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Digital Health for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.心脏手术患者的数字健康:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;11(17):2411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11172411.
6
The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship Between Medication Literacy and Medication Adherence Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.自我效能在2型糖尿病患者用药知识与用药依从性之间关系中的中介作用
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jul 13;17:1657-1670. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S413385. eCollection 2023.
7
A comparison of methods for the measurement of adherence to antihypertensive multidrug therapy and the clinical consequences: a retrospective cohort study using the Korean nationwide claims database.一种抗高血压多药治疗依从性测量方法的比较及其临床后果:利用韩国全国索赔数据库进行的回顾性队列研究。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023050. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023050. Epub 2023 May 1.
8
Long-term participant retention and engagement patterns in an app and wearable-based multinational remote digital depression study.一项基于应用程序和可穿戴设备的跨国远程数字抑郁症研究中的长期参与者保留率和参与模式。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Feb 17;6(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00749-3.
9
Development and assessment of novel machine learning models to predict medication non-adherence risks in type 2 diabetics.开发和评估新型机器学习模型,以预测 2 型糖尿病患者的药物不依从风险。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1000622. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000622. eCollection 2022.
10
Digital health in older adults for the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases and frailty. A clinical consensus statement from the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice/Taskforce on Geriatric Cardiology, the ESC Digital Health Committee and the ESC Working Group on e-Cardiology.老年人的数字健康:用于预防和管理心血管疾病和虚弱。ESC 实践理事会/老年心脏病学工作组、ESC 数字健康委员会和 ESC 电子心脏病学工作组的临床共识声明。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):2808-2822. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14022. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.
利用众包对糖尿病视网膜病变眼底照片进行快速分级。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 30;16(10):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3807.
4
Associations between statin adherence level, health care costs, and utilization.他汀类药物依从性水平、医疗成本与利用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Jul;20(7):703-13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.7.703.
5
Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update.美国成年人的多种慢性疾病:2012 年更新。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Apr 17;11:E62. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130389.
6
Adherence and health care costs.依从性与医疗保健成本。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014 Feb 20;7:35-44. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S19801. eCollection 2014.
7
Adherence to statins in primary prevention: yearly adherence changes and outcomes.一级预防中他汀类药物的依从性:年度依从性变化及结果
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Jan;20(1):51-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.51.
8
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2014年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28-e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Medication possession ratio: implications of using fixed and variable observation periods in assessing adherence with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis.药物持有率:在评估多发性硬化症患者对疾病修饰药物的依从性时使用固定和可变观察期的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jun 12;7:509-16. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S40736. Print 2013.
10
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.2012 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.