Vega Charles, Becker Russell V, Mucha Lisa, Lorenz Betty H, Eaddy Michael T, Ogbonnaya Augustina O
a University of California Irvine , Department of Family Medicine , Orange , CA , USA.
b Russell Becker Consulting , Chicago , IL , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1879-1889. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1347092. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
To evaluate the association between adherence to antidepressants and an effect on clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D).
This retrospective study used MarketScan claims data from January 2012 to March 2014. Study entry was the first claim for an antidepressant and a diagnosis code for MDD and T2D in the prior 6 months. Adherence and persistence with antidepressant therapy in the first 180 days were defined as medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥ 80% and length of therapy (LOT), with no treatment gap of >15 days, respectively. T2D control (HbA1c <7%), oral diabetes medication adherence, and healthcare costs were measured in the 12 month post-index period. The impact of antidepressant adherence and persistence on outcomes was assessed using multivariable analyses.
Among the 1361 patients included, the mean age was 59 years and 55% were women. About one-third of the patients were adherent (35.9%, mean MPR = 40%), persistent (32.0%, average LOT = 100 days), and adherent/persistent (31.2%) on antidepressants. Being adherent, persistent, or adherent/persistent to antidepressants was associated with a two-fold improvement in adherence to oral diabetes medications. Of those with HbA1c data (n = 121), adherence or adherence/persistence to antidepressants was associated with patients being five times more likely to have T2D control (odds ratio [OR]: 4.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39, 17.59, p = .0134). Comparison between antidepressant-persistent and non-persistent patients was not significant. Mean difference in adjusted all-cause annual costs showed lower costs among antidepressant-adherent and adherent/persistent patients (adherent: -$350, 95% CI: -$462, -$247; adherent/persistent: -$1165; 95% CI: -$1280, -$1060).
Patients with better antidepressant adherence and adherence/persistence demonstrated better HbA1c control, with lower all-cause total and medical costs. Adherence, persistence, or adherence/persistence to antidepressants was associated with improved adherence to oral diabetes medications.
评估重度抑郁症(MDD)合并2型糖尿病(T2D)患者对抗抑郁药的依从性与临床结局及医疗费用之间的关联。
这项回顾性研究使用了2012年1月至2014年3月的MarketScan理赔数据。研究纳入标准为在前6个月内首次开具抗抑郁药处方以及有MDD和T2D的诊断代码。前180天内抗抑郁治疗的依从性和持续性分别定义为药物持有率(MPR)≥80%和治疗时长(LOT),且治疗间隔不超过15天。在索引期后的12个月内测量T2D控制情况(糖化血红蛋白<7%)、口服降糖药依从性和医疗费用。使用多变量分析评估抗抑郁药依从性和持续性对结局的影响。
纳入的1361例患者中,平均年龄为59岁,55%为女性。约三分之一的患者对抗抑郁药有依从性(35.9%,平均MPR = 40%)、持续性(32.0%,平均LOT = 100天)以及依从/持续(31.2%)。对抗抑郁药有依从性、持续性或依从/持续与口服降糖药依从性提高两倍相关。在有糖化血红蛋白数据的患者(n = 121)中,对抗抑郁药的依从性或依从/持续与T2D得到控制的患者可能性高出五倍相关(优势比[OR]:4.95;95%置信区间[CI]:1.39,17.59,p = 0.0134)。抗抑郁药持续组与非持续组患者之间的比较无显著差异。调整后的全因年度成本均值差异显示,抗抑郁药依从组和依从/持续组患者的成本较低(依从组:-$350,95% CI:-$462,-$247;依从/持续组:-$1165;95% CI:-$1280,-$1060)。
抗抑郁药依从性和依从/持续情况较好的患者糖化血红蛋白控制更佳,全因总成本和医疗成本更低。对抗抑郁药的依从性、持续性或依从/持续与口服降糖药依从性改善相关。