Melo Thiago Araújo de, Duarte Antonio Carlos Magalhães, Bezerra Thaysa Samanta, França Fabrícia, Soares Neila Silva, Brito Debora
Escola de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Salvador - Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Instituto Sócrates Guanaes - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31(1):27-33. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190006. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit.
Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot.
The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99).
The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings.
评估五次坐立试验在入住重症监护病房的老年患者中的安全性和临床测量特性。
根据不良事件发生率并通过血流动力学和呼吸数据评估测试安全性。此外,使用组内相关系数、测量标准误差、标准误差百分比变化、奥特曼-布兰德图和生存一致性图研究可靠性特性。
发现五次坐立试验的总体适用性较低,29.8%的患者符合纳入标准。在符合纳入标准的住院患者中,只有44%进行了该测试,且无需任何患者中断测试。心率(79.7±10.2次/分/86.6±9.7次/分;p=0.001)和收缩压(118±21.4mmHg/129±21.5mmHg;p=0.031)是仅有的呈现显著统计学增加的变量,没有证据表明对测试的反应加剧。此外,参与测试的患者均未报告不良事件,重测信度和评分者间信度均较高(组内相关系数≥0.99)。
五次坐立试验被证明是安全的,并且具有出色的可靠性。然而,其临床应用可能仅限于医院环境中功能较高的老年人。