Suppr超能文献

五次坐立试验:老年重症监护病房患者出院时的安全性和可靠性

The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge.

作者信息

Melo Thiago Araújo de, Duarte Antonio Carlos Magalhães, Bezerra Thaysa Samanta, França Fabrícia, Soares Neila Silva, Brito Debora

机构信息

Escola de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Salvador - Salvador (BA), Brasil.

Instituto Sócrates Guanaes - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31(1):27-33. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190006. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit.

METHODS

Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot.

RESULTS

The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99).

CONCLUSION

The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings.

摘要

目的

评估五次坐立试验在入住重症监护病房的老年患者中的安全性和临床测量特性。

方法

根据不良事件发生率并通过血流动力学和呼吸数据评估测试安全性。此外,使用组内相关系数、测量标准误差、标准误差百分比变化、奥特曼-布兰德图和生存一致性图研究可靠性特性。

结果

发现五次坐立试验的总体适用性较低,29.8%的患者符合纳入标准。在符合纳入标准的住院患者中,只有44%进行了该测试,且无需任何患者中断测试。心率(79.7±10.2次/分/86.6±9.7次/分;p=0.001)和收缩压(118±21.4mmHg/129±21.5mmHg;p=0.031)是仅有的呈现显著统计学增加的变量,没有证据表明对测试的反应加剧。此外,参与测试的患者均未报告不良事件,重测信度和评分者间信度均较高(组内相关系数≥0.99)。

结论

五次坐立试验被证明是安全的,并且具有出色的可靠性。然而,其临床应用可能仅限于医院环境中功能较高的老年人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6374/6443310/9d5cfef82b33/rbti-31-01-0027-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验