Ekroos Rachell A, Shannon Sarah E
College of Nursing, Montana State University.
J Forensic Nurs. 2019 Jun;15(2):71-77. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000234.
Depending on the type of physical contact involved during a sexual assault offense, samples collected from a suspect's body may carry greater probative value than samples collected from a victim's body. However, unlike forensic medical examinations for persons identified as victims of a sexual assault, no professional consensus exists for what constitutes a high-quality forensic medical examination standard for persons identified as suspects, or the accused. The purpose of this article is to explore underlying assumptions that may contribute to disparate practices and inequalities in the provision of forensic medical examinations for persons suspected of committing a sexual offense and persons identified as victims of a sexual offense.
根据性侵犯犯罪过程中涉及的身体接触类型,从嫌疑人身上采集的样本可能比从受害者身上采集的样本具有更高的证明价值。然而,与针对被认定为性侵犯受害者的法医检查不同,对于被认定为嫌疑人或被告的人,高质量法医检查标准的构成尚无专业共识。本文的目的是探讨一些潜在假设,这些假设可能导致在为涉嫌性犯罪的人和被认定为性侵犯受害者的人提供法医检查时出现不同的做法和不平等现象。