Suppr超能文献

2000-2017 年抗精神病药、抗抑郁药和兴奋剂药物随机对照试验中的撤药混杂。

Withdrawal Confounding in Randomized Controlled Trials of Antipsychotic, Antidepressant, and Stimulant Drugs, 2000-2017.

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA,

Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA,

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(2):105-113. doi: 10.1159/000496734. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Results of relapse prevention randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which discontinue psychotropic drug treatment from some participants may be confounded by drug withdrawal symptoms. We test for the confound by calculating whether ≥50% of the difference in relapse risk between drug-discontinued and drug-maintained groups is present at discontinuation time points (DCTs) with "short" and "long" assumptions regarding onset and duration of withdrawal symptoms.

METHODS

In eligible RCTs of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and stimulants from 2000 to 2017 (n = 30) selected from a systematic review, differences in relapse risk were examined by arithmetic and graphical comparison of mean behavioral scores or survival plots.

RESULTS

Only 14 studies (46.6%) with 15 analyses of relapse risk provided sufficient data. Under short and long DCTs, 9 of 13 (69.2%) and 7 of 9 (77.8%) interpretable analyses, respectively, suggested a withdrawal confound. The proportion of endpoint placebo-maintenance group difference present by the DCT averaged 69.1% (range, 58.7-148.0%, n = 13) for short DCT assumptions, and 79.0% (range, 51.5-183.3%, n = 9) under long DCTs. One study (3.33%) controlled for withdraw al effects, and 1 yielded inconclusive results.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support suggestions that withdrawal symptoms confound the results of relapse prevention RCTs. Accounting for such symptoms in RCTs is an ethical, scientific, and clinical imperative. Justifications for relapse prevention RCTs employing a discontinuation procedure require more scrutiny.

摘要

背景

在一些参与者中停止使用精神药物治疗的复发预防随机对照试验(RCT)的结果可能因停药症状而受到混淆。我们通过计算在停药时间点(DCT)上,药物停药组和药物维持组之间复发风险差异的≥50%是否存在“短”和“长”假设的药物戒断症状的发病和持续时间来检验这种混杂。

方法

在 2000 年至 2017 年期间,从系统评价中选择了 30 项抗抑郁药、抗精神病药和兴奋剂的合格 RCT,通过算术和图形比较行为评分或生存图来检查复发风险的差异。

结果

只有 14 项研究(46.6%)提供了 15 项复发风险分析的数据。在短和长的 DCT 下,分别有 9 项(69.2%)和 7 项(77.8%)可解释的分析表明存在戒断混杂。在短 DCT 假设下,DCT 平均占终点安慰剂维持组差异的 69.1%(范围为 58.7-148.0%,n=13),长 DCT 下占 79.0%(范围为 51.5-183.3%,n=9)。一项研究(3.33%)控制了戒断效应,另一项研究得出了不确定的结果。

结论

这些结果支持了停药症状混淆复发预防 RCT 结果的观点。在 RCT 中考虑这些症状是伦理、科学和临床的必要。对采用停药程序的复发预防 RCT 的理由需要更仔细的审查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验