Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gi, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, 22 Gwanpyeong-ro 170 beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 20;9(1):4926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41366-z.
There is a low incidence of reoperation after surgery. It is difficult to detect statistical differences between reoperation rates of different lumbar fusion surgeries. National population-based databases provide large, longitudinally followed cohorts that may help overcome this challenge. The purpose is to compare the repeat decompression and fusion rate after surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases according to different surgical fusion procedures based on national population-based databases and elucidate the risk factor for repeat decompression and fusions. The Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database was used. Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases and who underwent single-level fusion surgeries between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016, were included. They were divided into two groups based on procedure codes: posterolateral fusion or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The primary endpoint was repeat decompression and fusion. Age, sex, the presence of diabetes, osteoporosis, associated comorbidities, and hospital types were considered potential confounding factors. The repeat decompression and fusion rate was not different between the patients who underwent posterolateral fusion and those who underwent posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Old age, male sex, and hospital type were noted to be risk factors. The incidence of repeat decompression and fusion was independent on the fusion method.
手术后再手术的发生率较低。不同腰椎融合手术的再手术率很难检测到统计学差异。基于人群的国家数据库提供了大型的、纵向随访队列,这可能有助于克服这一挑战。本研究的目的是根据基于人群的国家数据库,比较不同手术融合程序治疗退行性腰椎疾病的术后重复减压和融合率,并阐明重复减压和融合的危险因素。使用了韩国健康保险审查和评估服务数据库。纳入 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日期间接受单节段融合手术诊断为退行性腰椎疾病的患者。根据手术代码将他们分为两组:后路融合或后路/经椎间孔腰椎体间融合。主要终点是重复减压和融合。考虑了年龄、性别、是否患有糖尿病、骨质疏松症、合并症和医院类型等潜在混杂因素。后路融合组和后路/经椎间孔腰椎体间融合组的重复减压和融合率没有差异。年龄较大、男性和医院类型是危险因素。重复减压和融合的发生率与融合方法无关。