Friedenberg Jay
1 Department of Psychology, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY, USA.
Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;66(2):112-125. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000432. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Recent studies have shown that preference judgments can vary considerably from one person to another and when these data are averaged the results can be misleading. In the current study, we examine individual differences in aesthetic preference for randomized visual patterns. In Experiment 1, we start with a structured checkerboard and progressively randomize its alternating black and white squares by 10% increments. In Experiment 2, we begin with a structured square array of vertical line segments and progressively randomize line orientation. In both experiments, there were strong differences in responding with most participants favoring either ordered or randomized versions. We found differences in Big-Five trait scores across these groupings. Individuals who scored high on extroversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness all preferred random patterns. Preference results for openness and neuroticism varied across the experiments. Explanations for predicted and obtained trait outcomes are provided.
最近的研究表明,偏好判断在人与人之间可能有很大差异,而当这些数据被平均时,结果可能会产生误导。在当前的研究中,我们考察了对随机视觉图案的审美偏好中的个体差异。在实验1中,我们从一个结构化的棋盘开始,以10%的增量逐步随机化其黑白交替的方块。在实验2中,我们从一个由垂直线段组成的结构化方阵开始,逐步随机化线条方向。在两个实验中,反应都存在强烈差异,大多数参与者更喜欢有序或随机版本中的一种。我们发现这些分组在大五人格特质得分上存在差异。外向性、宜人性和尽责性得分高的个体都更喜欢随机图案。开放性和神经质的偏好结果在不同实验中有所不同。文中提供了对预测和获得的特质结果的解释。