Greenwood L H, Yrizarry J M, Hallett J W
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1986;9(2):93-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02577908.
We review our experience with seven patients, (12 affected extremities) with popliteal artery entrapment. The classic angiographic finding of medial deviation of the popliteal artery was found in only three patients (four extremities). Four patients (eight extremities) had no medial deviation of their popliteal arteries and required a stress runoff examination to demonstrate arterial entrapment. Five patients had bilateral entrapment. This patient series underscores the need to consider possible arterial entrapment even when the popliteal arteries appear normal on the resting runoff examination as well as the importance of imaging both extremities since the incidence of bilateral entrapment may be higher than previously recognized.
我们回顾了7例（12个受累肢体）腘动脉陷迫患者的治疗经验。仅3例患者（4个肢体）出现了腘动脉内侧移位这一典型血管造影表现。4例患者（8个肢体）的腘动脉未出现内侧移位，需要进行负荷血流检查以证实动脉陷迫。5例患者为双侧陷迫。该系列病例强调，即使在静息血流检查时腘动脉看似正常，也需考虑可能存在动脉陷迫，同时强调了对双侧肢体进行成像的重要性，因为双侧陷迫的发生率可能高于此前的认识。
