• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在姑息治疗中输注红细胞:姑息治疗医师的调查。

Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Palliative Care: A Survey of Palliative Care Physicians.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(9):1139-1142. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0605. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2018.0605
PMID:30896276
Abstract

Red blood cell transfusion is one therapeutic option for the treatment of anemia. Current transfusion practices and factors influencing the decision to prescribe this therapy are not well understood. To explore current transfusion practices, attitudes, and factors that influence the decision to transfuse among palliative care physicians. Self-administered questionnaire addressing clinical experiences and decision making pertaining to blood transfusion. Specialist palliative care physicians at two Canadian academic centers. Descriptive, presented as the number/proportion of respondents indicating a specific answer. Of 62 physicians surveyed, 29 (47%) responded to the study questionnaire. For patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, respectively, 79% and 82% of respondents reported prescribing blood transfusion; 59% and 46% reported that they would seldom recommend its discontinuation. Factors influential in the decision to transfuse included symptoms of anemia (97%), bleeding (62%), low hemoglobin (52%, of whom 87% indicated a hemoglobin threshold <70 g/L), and pressure from patients/families (48%). Physicians routinely reassessed patients for symptomatic improvement following transfusion, but 72% did not use an objective symptom scale. Twenty-six (90%) respondents believed that transfusion provided symptomatic benefit; the majority had observed adverse reactions to transfusion. Most perceived a lack of evidence to guide transfusion therapy in palliative care, and 79% indicated willingness to enroll their patients in a trial aiming to address this question. Most palliative care specialists consider red blood cell transfusion to have a role in symptom management, but many clinical and nonclinical factors influence their decisions to provide or discontinue transfusions. Prospective clinical trials will likely be needed to inform transfusion practices in this population.

摘要

红细胞输注是治疗贫血的一种治疗选择。目前的输血实践以及影响开具这种治疗的决策的因素尚不清楚。 目的 探索姑息治疗医生目前的输血实践、态度以及影响输血决策的因素。 自我管理的调查问卷,涉及与输血相关的临床经验和决策。 加拿大两家学术中心的专科姑息治疗医生。 描述性的,以表示表示特定答案的受访者的数量/比例。 在接受调查的 62 名医生中,有 29 名(47%)对研究问卷做出了回应。分别有 79%和 82%的受访者报告为实体瘤和血液恶性肿瘤患者开具了输血处方;59%和 46%的受访者报告他们很少会建议停止输血。影响输血决策的因素包括贫血症状(97%)、出血(62%)、低血红蛋白(52%,其中 87%的人表示血红蛋白阈值<70g/L)和来自患者/家属的压力(48%)。医生通常会在输血后重新评估患者的症状改善情况,但 72%的人不使用客观症状量表。26 名(90%)受访者认为输血可提供症状缓解;大多数人观察到输血的不良反应。大多数人认为缺乏指导姑息治疗中输血治疗的证据,79%的人表示愿意让他们的患者参加旨在解决这一问题的试验。 大多数姑息治疗专家认为红细胞输注在症状管理中具有作用,但许多临床和非临床因素影响他们提供或停止输血的决策。可能需要前瞻性临床试验来为这一人群的输血实践提供信息。

相似文献

1
Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Palliative Care: A Survey of Palliative Care Physicians.在姑息治疗中输注红细胞:姑息治疗医师的调查。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(9):1139-1142. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0605. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Red blood cell transfusion in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multidisciplinary North American survey.蛛网膜下腔出血患者的红细胞输血:一项多学科的北美调查。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R30. doi: 10.1186/cc9977. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
3
Blood transfusion practice in the UK and Ireland: a survey of palliative care physicians.英国和爱尔兰的输血实践:姑息治疗医师调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):474-477. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001494. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
International survey of transfusion practices for extremely premature infants.国际极低出生体重儿输血实践调查。
Semin Perinatol. 2012 Aug;36(4):244-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.004.
5
Understanding Perioperative Transfusion Practices in Gastrointestinal Surgery-a Practice Survey of General Surgeons.了解胃肠外科围手术期输血实践——普通外科医生的实践调查
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jun;20(6):1106-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3111-5. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
A cross-country comparison of intensive care physicians' beliefs about their transfusion behaviour: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.一项关于重症监护医师对其输血行为的信念的跨国比较:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2012 Sep 21;7:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-93.
7
Transfusion Practices Among General Surgeons at a Tertiary Care Center: a Survey Based Study.三级医疗中心普通外科医生的输血实践:一项基于调查的研究。
Med Arch. 2018 Dec;72(6):418-424. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.418-424.
8
National comparative audit of red blood cell transfusion practice in hospices: Recommendations for palliative care practice.全国临终关怀机构红细胞输血实践对比审计:姑息治疗实践建议。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jan;33(1):102-108. doi: 10.1177/0269216318801755. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
Variation in red cell transfusion decisions in the intensive care unit - a nationwide survey in the Netherlands.重症监护病房红细胞输血决策的差异——荷兰的一项全国性调查。
Vox Sang. 2018 May;113(4):378-385. doi: 10.1111/vox.12639. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Red blood cell transfusion in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: an international survey of physicians' attitudes.创伤性脑损伤危重症患者的红细胞输血:医生态度的国际调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;66(9):1038-1048. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01369-w. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Transfusions in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the End-of-Life: Are They Really Beneficial?晚期癌症临终患者的输血治疗:它们真的有益吗?
Indian J Palliat Care. 2025 Apr-Jun;31(2):186-191. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_356_2024. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Transfusion practices in patients with advanced cancer: a retrospective study in a palliative care service.晚期癌症患者的输血实践:一项姑息治疗服务机构的回顾性研究。
Porto Biomed J. 2022 Dec 1;7(6):e195. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000195. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Best Supportive Care of the Patient with Oesophageal Cancer.
食管癌患者的最佳支持性护理
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 19;14(24):6268. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246268.