Shah Samarth P, Twilla Jennifer D, Kemp Leonette, Phelps Gregory L, Reaves Anne
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2018 Dec;32(4):201-207. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2019.1577938. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition characterized by multiple vaso-occlusive complications, including acute pain crisis. The mainstay of treatment for patients presenting with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is pain control and adequate hydration. Currently, there are no studies to determine an optimal pain control regimen in adult SCD patients. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether outcomes differ in patients with VOC based on pain management treatment modality. A retrospective review of admissions with a primary diagnosis of VOC admitted to our facility was conducted. The primary outcome was to compare the average length of stay (LOS) in patients treated with intermittent injection (INT) or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Secondary outcomes assessed included 30-day readmission, treatment failure, and impact on pain scores. Of 302 admissions screened, 150 met inclusion criteria (INT: = 100; PCA: = 50). Selection of initial pain control regimen showed no difference in average LOS (INT: 5.96 ± 4.19 days vs. PCA: 6.01 ± 3.47 days; = .94) or 30-day readmission rates (INT: 21% vs. PCA: 16%; = .52). Treatment failure was significantly higher in the INT group, occurring in 64% of patients vs. 14% in the PCA group ( < .0001). Pain scores were not significantly impacted by selection of pain regimen. Our study indicates that INT and PCA treatment modalities are both effective at controlling pain in VOC; however, more patients in the INT group were characterized as having a treatment failure. Based on our results, it is reasonable to initiate PCA as the primary pain treatment strategy in SCD patients presenting in VOC.
镰状细胞病(SCD)是一种慢性疾病,其特征为多种血管阻塞性并发症,包括急性疼痛危象。对于出现血管阻塞性危象(VOC)的患者,治疗的主要方法是控制疼痛和充分补液。目前,尚无研究确定成年SCD患者的最佳疼痛控制方案。本研究的主要目的是评估基于疼痛管理治疗方式,VOC患者的治疗结果是否存在差异。我们对本院收治的以VOC为主要诊断的患者进行了回顾性研究。主要结果是比较接受间歇性注射(INT)或患者自控镇痛(PCA)治疗的患者的平均住院时间(LOS)。评估的次要结果包括30天再入院率、治疗失败率以及对疼痛评分的影响。在筛选的302例入院病例中,150例符合纳入标准(INT组:100例;PCA组:50例)。初始疼痛控制方案的选择在平均住院时间(INT组:5.96±4.19天 vs. PCA组:6.01±3.47天;P = 0.94)或30天再入院率(INT组:21% vs. PCA组:16%;P = 0.52)方面无差异。INT组的治疗失败率显著更高,为64%,而PCA组为14%(P < 0.0001)。疼痛方案的选择对疼痛评分没有显著影响。我们的研究表明,INT和PCA治疗方式在控制VOC疼痛方面均有效;然而,INT组有更多患者被判定为治疗失败。基于我们的研究结果,对于出现VOC的SCD患者,将PCA作为主要疼痛治疗策略是合理的。