Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning & Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214114. eCollection 2019.
While access to safe sanitation is a global issue, there are large disparities in access. Women living in informal settlements, in particular, are disproportionately affected by lack of access to sanitation. Without adequate sanitation, these women may resort to unsafe strategies to manage their sanitation needs, but limited research has focused specifically on this issue. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from women in the Mathare informal settlement in Nairobi, Kenya in 2016. A latent class analysis (LCA) using the quantitative data yielded five distinct sanitation profiles (SP) among women in Mathare. In-depth interviews and sanitation walks with women added further detail about the characteristics of and motivations underlying each profile. Women's sanitation profiles in these settlements are complex. A majority of women in this study utilized an unsafe method of disposal at least once in a 24-hour period that increased their risk of direct exposure to waste and harmful pathogens.
虽然安全卫生设施的获取是一个全球性问题,但在获取途径方面存在着巨大的差异。生活在非正规住区的妇女尤其受到无法获得卫生设施的不成比例的影响。如果没有足够的卫生设施,这些妇女可能会采取不安全的策略来满足她们的卫生需求,但有限的研究专门针对这个问题。2016 年,在肯尼亚内罗毕的 Mathare 非正规住区收集了来自妇女的定性和定量数据。对定量数据使用潜在类别分析(LCA)得出了 Mathare 妇女的五个不同的卫生设施概况(SP)。对妇女进行的深入访谈和卫生设施实地考察进一步详细说明了每个概况的特点和背后的动机。这些住区中妇女的卫生设施概况很复杂。在这项研究中,大多数妇女在 24 小时内至少使用了一次不安全的处理方法,这增加了她们直接接触废物和有害病原体的风险。