• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟的卫生设施:使用者满意度及其决定因素。

Sanitation facilities in Kampala slums, Uganda: users' satisfaction and determinant factors.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 69, CH-8001, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Health Res. 2013;23(3):191-204. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2012.713095. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1080/09603123.2012.713095
PMID:22873693
Abstract

Access to improved sanitation is a key preventive measure against sanitary-related gastro-enteric diseases such as diarrhoea. We assessed the access to sanitation facilities and users' satisfaction in 50 randomly selected slums of Kampala through a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2010. A total of 1500 household respondents were interviewed. Sixty-eight per cent of the respondents used shared toilets, 20% private, 11% public toilets and less than 1% reported using flying toilets or practising open defecation. More than half of the respondents (51.7%) were not satisfied with their sanitation facilities. Determinants for satisfaction with the facilities used included the nature and type of toilet facilities used, their cleanliness, and the number of families sharing them. The study findings showed that slum dwellers had high access to sanitation facilities. However, most of them were shared and majority of the respondents were not satisfied with their facilities, primarily due to cleanliness and over demand.

摘要

获得更好的卫生设施是预防与卫生相关的肠胃疾病(如腹泻)的关键措施。我们通过 2010 年进行的横断面调查,评估了 50 个随机选择的坎帕拉贫民窟的卫生设施获取情况和使用者的满意度。共有 1500 户家庭受访者接受了采访。68%的受访者使用共享厕所,20%使用私人厕所,11%使用公共厕所,不到 1%的人报告使用流动厕所或露天排便。超过一半的受访者(51.7%)对他们的卫生设施不满意。对使用设施的满意度的决定因素包括使用的厕所设施的性质和类型、其清洁度以及共享它们的家庭数量。研究结果表明,贫民窟居民获得卫生设施的机会很高。然而,它们大多数是共用的,大多数受访者对他们的设施不满意,主要是因为清洁度和过度需求。

相似文献

1
Sanitation facilities in Kampala slums, Uganda: users' satisfaction and determinant factors.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟的卫生设施:使用者满意度及其决定因素。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2013;23(3):191-204. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2012.713095. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
2
Effectiveness of group discussions and commitment in improving cleaning behaviour of shared sanitation users in Kampala, Uganda slums.小组讨论和承诺对改善乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟共享卫生设施使用者清洁行为的有效性。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.059. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
3
Shared toilet users' collective cleaning and determinant factors in Kampala slums, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟共用厕所使用者的集体清洁情况及决定因素
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;14:1260. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1260.
4
Neighbour-shared versus communal latrines in urban slums: a cross-sectional study in Orissa, India exploring household demographics, accessibility, privacy, use and cleanliness.印度奥里萨邦城市贫民窟邻里共用厕所与公共厕所对比:一项探索家庭人口统计学、可达性、隐私、使用情况和清洁程度的横断面研究
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Nov;109(11):690-9. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trv082.
5
Shared Sanitation Versus Individual Household Latrines in Urban Slums: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orissa, India.印度奥里萨邦城市贫民窟中共享卫生设施与家庭独立厕所的对比:一项横断面研究
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Aug;93(2):263-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0812. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Slum inhabitants' perceptions and decision-making processes related to an innovative sanitation service: evaluating the Blue Diversion Toilet in Kampala (Uganda).贫民窟居民对一项创新卫生服务的认知及决策过程:评估乌干达坎帕拉的蓝色分流厕所
Int J Environ Health Res. 2015;25(6):670-84. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2015.1007842. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
Behaviour change intervention to improve shared toilet maintenance and cleanliness in urban slums of Dhaka: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.改变行为干预措施以改善达卡城市贫民窟公共厕所的维护与清洁状况:一项整群随机对照试验
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):1000-1011. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12902. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Seasonal variations and shared latrine cleaning practices in the slums of Kampala city, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市贫民窟的季节变化与共用厕所清洁做法
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3036-7.
9
Opportunities and barriers to effective operation and maintenance of public toilets in informal settlements: perspectives from toilet operators in Kampala.非正规住区公共厕所有效运营和维护的机遇和障碍:来自坎帕拉厕所运营者的观点。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(4):359-370. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1544610. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
Inadequate sanitation in healthcare facilities: A comprehensive evaluation of toilets in major hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh.医疗设施卫生条件不足:对孟加拉国达卡主要医院厕所的综合评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0295879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295879. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of community-led total sanitation on open defecation in Uganda: A propensity score-matched analysis.社区主导的全面卫生设施对乌干达露天排便的影响:倾向得分匹配分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0329307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329307. eCollection 2025.
2
Sanitation-related withholding and suppression among women in urban Uganda and India.乌干达和印度城市地区女性中与卫生设施相关的保留和抑制情况。
Nat Water. 2025;3(7):782-792. doi: 10.1038/s44221-025-00452-5. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
3
Validity of a visual analogue scale to measure and value the perceived level of sanitation: evidence from Ghana and Mozambique.
视觉模拟量表用于测量和评估感知卫生水平的有效性:来自加纳和莫桑比克的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Jan 11;40(1):42-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae092.
4
Shared sanitation facilities and risk of respiratory virus transmission in resource-poor settings: A COVID-19 modeling case study.资源匮乏地区共享卫生设施与呼吸道病毒传播风险:一项新冠肺炎建模案例研究
Risk Anal. 2025 Mar;45(3):638-652. doi: 10.1111/risa.17633. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
5
What works in sanitation promotion?什么因素有利于推动环境卫生?
Health Promot Int. 2023 Dec 1;38(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad162.
6
Food price volatility and socio-economic inequalities in poor food consumption status during coronavirus disease-2019 lockdown among slum and non-slum households in urban Nansana municipality, Uganda.乌干达纳桑纳市贫民窟和非贫民窟家庭在 2019 年冠状病毒病封锁期间,食品价格波动与贫困食品消费状况的社会经济不平等。
Nutr J. 2023 Jan 11;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12937-023-00836-x.
7
Shared but Clean Household Toilets: What Makes This Possible? Evidence from Ghana and Kenya.共用但清洁的家庭厕所:是什么让这成为可能?来自加纳和肯尼亚的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074271.
8
Where Shared Sanitation is the Only Immediate Option: A Research Agenda for Shared Sanitation in Densely Populated Low-Income Urban Settings.在共享卫生设施是唯一即时选择的情况下:人口稠密的低收入城市环境中共享卫生设施的研究议程。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Nov 16;104(2):429-432. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0985.
9
Barriers and opportunities for cleanliness of shared sanitation facilities in low-income settlements in Kenya.肯尼亚低收入住区共享卫生设施清洁的障碍与机遇
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):1632. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09768-1.
10
Are There Seasonal Variations in Faecal Contamination of Exposure Pathways? An Assessment in a Low-Income Settlement in Uganda.粪便污染暴露途径是否存在季节性差异?乌干达一个低收入住区的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;17(17):6355. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176355.